From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1877BFC9ED5 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 12:53:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=zAvl/uexuwSDF67L5jNkH/FLAxAQ0QZTSrY80PukCik=; b=G1GTjyZp1TNjXI/WhNlnVsE7Tq 9vCvgzvcuY7XuATEw4o+m/BTutdkR/GWmRC+RGaqc/x8mOrfcTO4EROGIKdJk2kReAb2HXY2UJNoY Ge8jVQdPH86oM5Xmc833jw/hpmn6wcguWOSzZUZWMDLZui6Wo9hIKqPf8/smd2rWQ4SG4QDJlXV+y ouJK/qa4zrWECSYQLDvM5MNn35KpntiFsYfxrDdUn91nq82lq7k4KozlHIFjHV45IlT7CO/NZqInW Tn7SIV4yWY83AbslKvt62GpZWScGeKAq3Jlngz4UE1ha5JN2ivrqU7FWLrCGI148pi6MoVTeDjMaa egYPhXdg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vyr9t-00000005Clq-0v4u; Sat, 07 Mar 2026 12:53:29 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vyr9r-00000005Cl6-0s9Y; Sat, 07 Mar 2026 12:53:28 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3EF418E5; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 12:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F8A6C19422; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 12:53:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772888006; bh=NkU8Z7BJW6IMqFyOQfV2xg9wnLMdZ94S1srnXoDa+2U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MJa2mXujjMivItr7He25l3aRJMra5ArgA9ylye2kejRpGXXoaG+EdtHG44jdXLZ2U xfnayY6gdJePSrCV1+FdCv5yMvUIvbOQ1sT0YyebUV/FbYYdtaAwdi5U3tQwdTRoAd aAWZxrW11TKXeqlHb69RT/jIbDFeFEHJgD3DNBeHcT8XTkE/q2te3kXMox25ni8Sh2 BHm2/bBx5NiMzFzeiMPtsYUpkCo0En+uOY+MG/2penhTVFMVBzuXp6PGQ9kC2jJD+1 LtIWHuBthAlQoaHLa7QNLn8YI0p7mBXPbfzwNX7GSmcMPhvsLREa4B5NmSfFX2z19N RXqCoJj+hOaOw== Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 13:53:24 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Yu-Chun Lin Cc: linusw@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com, afaerber@suse.com, james.tai@realtek.com, cy.huang@realtek.com, stanley_chang@realtek.com, tychang@realtek.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] dt-bindings: pinctrl: realtek: Rename 'realtek,duty-cycle' to 'realtek,pulse-width-adjust' Message-ID: <20260307-purring-kind-binturong-1fcb37@quoll> References: <20260306075244.1170399-1-eleanor.lin@realtek.com> <20260306075244.1170399-10-eleanor.lin@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260306075244.1170399-10-eleanor.lin@realtek.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260307_045327_489466_CE0099D4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.73 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 03:52:39PM +0800, Yu-Chun Lin wrote: > From: Tzuyi Chang > > Rename 'realtek,duty-cycle' to 'realtek,pulse-width-adjust'. > > The previous name was misleading because this hardware block is not a PWM > generator. It does not generate a signal with a specific frequency and > duty ratio. > > Instead, it provides a fixed nanosecond-level adjustment to the rising/ > falling edges of an existing signal. > > Signed-off-by: Tzuyi Chang > Co-developed-by: Yu-Chun Lin > Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin > --- > .../bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml | 9 ++++++--- > .../bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1319d-pinctrl.yaml | 9 ++++++--- > .../bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1619b-pinctrl.yaml | 9 ++++++--- > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml > index 90bd49d87d2e..7b3888b2cea8 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml > @@ -133,10 +133,13 @@ patternProperties: > minimum: 0 > maximum: 7 > > - realtek,duty-cycle: > + realtek,pulse-width-adjust: No, that's ABI break without explanation. "misleading" is not the sufficient argument for breaking ABI. You are stuck with the ABI you added back in 2023. Best regards, Krzysztof