public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	"Anton Protopopov" <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>,
	"Shahab Vahedi" <list+bpf@vahedi.org>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Tiezhu Yang" <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
	"Hengqi Chen" <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>,
	"Johan Almbladh" <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>,
	"Paul Burton" <paulburton@kernel.org>,
	"Hari Bathini" <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christophe Leroy" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	"Naveen N Rao" <naveen@kernel.org>,
	"Luke Nelson" <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>,
	"Xi Wang" <xi.wang@gmail.com>, "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
	"Pu Lehui" <pulehui@huawei.com>,
	"Ilya Leoshkevich" <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Wang YanQing" <udknight@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpf-next v7 1/5] bpf: Move constants blinding from JIT to verifier
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2026 01:23:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202603080148.tjqluX6P-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260307103949.2340104-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>

Hi Xu,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Xu-Kuohai/bpf-Move-constants-blinding-from-JIT-to-verifier/20260307-181538
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260307103949.2340104-2-xukuohai%40huaweicloud.com
patch subject: [bpf-next v7 1/5] bpf: Move constants blinding from JIT to verifier
config: m68k-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260308/202603080148.tjqluX6P-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260308/202603080148.tjqluX6P-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603080148.tjqluX6P-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function 'fixup_call_args':
>> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:23100:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'bpf_jit_blind_constants' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
   23100 |                 err = bpf_jit_blind_constants(env);
         |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/bpf_jit_blind_constants +23100 kernel/bpf/verifier.c

 23087	
 23088	static int fixup_call_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 23089	{
 23090	#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
 23091		struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
 23092		struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
 23093		bool has_kfunc_call = bpf_prog_has_kfunc_call(prog);
 23094		int i, depth;
 23095	#endif
 23096		int err = 0;
 23097	
 23098		if (env->prog->jit_requested &&
 23099		    !bpf_prog_is_offloaded(env->prog->aux)) {
 23100			err = bpf_jit_blind_constants(env);
 23101			if (err)
 23102				return err;
 23103			err = jit_subprogs(env);
 23104			if (err == 0)
 23105				return 0;
 23106			if (err == -EFAULT)
 23107				return err;
 23108		}
 23109	#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
 23110		if (has_kfunc_call) {
 23111			verbose(env, "calling kernel functions are not allowed in non-JITed programs\n");
 23112			return -EINVAL;
 23113		}
 23114		if (env->subprog_cnt > 1 && env->prog->aux->tail_call_reachable) {
 23115			/* When JIT fails the progs with bpf2bpf calls and tail_calls
 23116			 * have to be rejected, since interpreter doesn't support them yet.
 23117			 */
 23118			verbose(env, "tail_calls are not allowed in non-JITed programs with bpf-to-bpf calls\n");
 23119			return -EINVAL;
 23120		}
 23121		for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++, insn++) {
 23122			if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) {
 23123				/* When JIT fails the progs with callback calls
 23124				 * have to be rejected, since interpreter doesn't support them yet.
 23125				 */
 23126				verbose(env, "callbacks are not allowed in non-JITed programs\n");
 23127				return -EINVAL;
 23128			}
 23129	
 23130			if (!bpf_pseudo_call(insn))
 23131				continue;
 23132			depth = get_callee_stack_depth(env, insn, i);
 23133			if (depth < 0)
 23134				return depth;
 23135			bpf_patch_call_args(insn, depth);
 23136		}
 23137		err = 0;
 23138	#endif
 23139		return err;
 23140	}
 23141	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-07 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-07 10:39 [bpf-next v7 0/5] emit ENDBR/BTI instructions for indirect jump targets Xu Kuohai
2026-03-07 10:39 ` [bpf-next v7 1/5] bpf: Move constants blinding from JIT to verifier Xu Kuohai
2026-03-07 17:08   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-09  9:22     ` Xu Kuohai
2026-03-07 17:23   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-03-07 17:23   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-07 10:39 ` [bpf-next v7 2/5] bpf: Pass bpf_verifier_env to JIT Xu Kuohai
2026-03-07 10:39 ` [bpf-next v7 3/5] bpf: Add helper to detect indirect jump targets Xu Kuohai
2026-03-07 17:14   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-09  9:21     ` Xu Kuohai
2026-03-07 10:39 ` [bpf-next v7 4/5] bpf, x86: Emit ENDBR for " Xu Kuohai
2026-03-07 10:39 ` [bpf-next v7 5/5] bpf, arm64: Emit BTI for indirect jump target Xu Kuohai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202603080148.tjqluX6P-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hengqi.chen@gmail.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=list+bpf@vahedi.org \
    --cc=luke.r.nels@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=udknight@gmail.com \
    --cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
    --cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox