public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Zhaoyang Yu <2426767509@qq.com>
Cc: sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com, daniel@zonque.org,
	haojian.zhuang@gmail.com, robert.jarzmik@free.fr,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] USB: pxa27x_udc: check return value of clk_enable
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 15:58:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026031145-stencil-italics-89b3@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_648835A07EDBB7CA94B66FAF5662EC2F1407@qq.com>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 01:56:14PM +0000, Zhaoyang Yu wrote:
> clk_enable() may fail according to the API contract.
> Previously, udc_enable() ignored its return value and returned void.
> 
> Modify udc_enable() to return the error code. Additionally, update
> all of its callers (pxa_udc_pullup, pxa_udc_vbus_session,
> pxa27x_udc_start, pxa_udc_probe, and pxa_udc_resume) to check
> this return value and handle the failure properly with necessary
> cleanups or rollbacks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Yu <2426767509@qq.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Changed udc_enable() return type from void to int.
> - Propagated the error to all caller functions and added proper
>   error handling/rollback per Greg KH's review.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Fixed a formatting issue by moving the 'int ret' declaration to
>   the beginning of the function block.
> 
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pxa27x_udc.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pxa27x_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pxa27x_udc.c
> index 897f53601b5b..0a5f05f8e73c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pxa27x_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pxa27x_udc.c
> @@ -1462,7 +1462,7 @@ static int pxa_udc_wakeup(struct usb_gadget *_gadget)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void udc_enable(struct pxa_udc *udc);
> +static int udc_enable(struct pxa_udc *udc);
>  static void udc_disable(struct pxa_udc *udc);
>  
>  /**
> @@ -1519,14 +1519,18 @@ static int should_disable_udc(struct pxa_udc *udc)
>  static int pxa_udc_pullup(struct usb_gadget *_gadget, int is_active)
>  {
>  	struct pxa_udc *udc = to_gadget_udc(_gadget);
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!udc->gpiod && !udc->udc_command)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	dplus_pullup(udc, is_active);
>  
> -	if (should_enable_udc(udc))
> -		udc_enable(udc);
> +	if (should_enable_udc(udc)) {
> +		ret = udc_enable(udc);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}

DOn't you need to change the pullup?

>  	if (should_disable_udc(udc))
>  		udc_disable(udc);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1545,10 +1549,14 @@ static int pxa_udc_pullup(struct usb_gadget *_gadget, int is_active)
>  static int pxa_udc_vbus_session(struct usb_gadget *_gadget, int is_active)
>  {
>  	struct pxa_udc *udc = to_gadget_udc(_gadget);
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	udc->vbus_sensed = is_active;
> -	if (should_enable_udc(udc))
> -		udc_enable(udc);
> +	if (should_enable_udc(udc)) {
> +		ret = udc_enable(udc);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}

Shouldn't you change vbus_sensed?


>  	if (should_disable_udc(udc))
>  		udc_disable(udc);
>  
> @@ -1691,12 +1699,18 @@ static void udc_init_data(struct pxa_udc *dev)
>   * Enables the udc device : enables clocks, udc interrupts, control endpoint
>   * interrupts, sets usb as UDC client and setups endpoints.
>   */
> -static void udc_enable(struct pxa_udc *udc)
> +static int udc_enable(struct pxa_udc *udc)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	if (udc->enabled)
> -		return;
> +		return 0;
>  
> -	clk_enable(udc->clk);
> +	ret = clk_enable(udc->clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(udc->dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  	udc_writel(udc, UDCICR0, 0);
>  	udc_writel(udc, UDCICR1, 0);
>  	udc_clear_mask_UDCCR(udc, UDCCR_UDE);
> @@ -1726,6 +1740,8 @@ static void udc_enable(struct pxa_udc *udc)
>  	pio_irq_enable(&udc->pxa_ep[0]);
>  
>  	udc->enabled = 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -1761,10 +1777,16 @@ static int pxa27x_udc_start(struct usb_gadget *g,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (should_enable_udc(udc))
> -		udc_enable(udc);
> +	if (should_enable_udc(udc)) {
> +		retval = udc_enable(udc);
> +		if (retval)
> +			goto fail_enable;
> +	}

No other unwinding is needed?

thanks,

greg k-h


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11 13:56 [PATCH v3] USB: pxa27x_udc: check return value of clk_enable Zhaoyang Yu
2026-03-11 14:58 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-03-12  8:12   ` 俞朝阳

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026031145-stencil-italics-89b3@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=2426767509@qq.com \
    --cc=daniel@zonque.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox