From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2E4106703C for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=iHbUooFMvANOZ5eEmxR11NQpXOt5Yepk2Tb3aJhTApE=; b=c5MQ6vvBCqoh/dgZWoJJ6p6iTg ozQinQ40fthU4ojNH4NSvEd4m4P/4OShFiu2190dDdeaSGNFDA617MnCszH1OjpqIMl5GSr2r2n9T UdEMupy6nrkmtdRvvqukftJ9lbjcnnh8KjOWmz6Rr9TJXmEazm7HnCTy/v2YC6EfvENV+SK4esK91 ladOUKgIsSH5BuSwxpL2+nzbJYKg0b7fkAvMzi+FlPOB+7DQEJ1FMkcn4HOjb5ZxpWnS0eLSsVPWK 6fjwSb2sMbIA+shF5Lt+2arjiSIlIe2dpYUJhFynfQhwHrTU3QDgmoVSvCB4rKvYTEGvFZW0BZwPT GNxI88Sg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w0hul-0000000EMzr-2JZx; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:31 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w0huj-0000000EMzK-2HR4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:29 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D1B6012A; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52E27C4CEF7; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773329128; bh=SPRgYaYcRXRx+Oi439MXJIfPzTvRSwq+RQAg9WxA+zI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=anlMdoQkbijqZRi0VJYy8JBbtdJ99d2UOvXTrDzEOVDqrazZ6mlhAWtuLSpH6Ikm7 6ImOvTMCoS58xXWPq/+6X/utGrHIGcvBwgk96I4N/ajMoIwKJWIDLfXvpsS3bO0Z83 +sJ9mXNCSi4hN0WN9fqqUgwL9IuxCYcvPync29cfTlZFa3ABCdAWQISQHK5TaAWJJG /ufBzJ/KTQjmlykVtxvcWqUW4jpt4DPDvSNi277E2jEfIykcwedRIG5rdoPgu5jow+ qRhOZoI1kNCcfSBJr/EWkoLr8E1m2YGHlpDgWGAhs7hzhZ6qWc0W8GUpMzZu5smpht 3wfDkDTqtxj4w== Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:24 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Dan Carpenter Cc: AKASHI Takahiro , Cristian Marussi , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sudeep Holla , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] arm_scmi: pinctrl: allow PINCTRL_REQUEST to return EOPNOTSUPP Message-ID: <20260312-abstract-dazzling-herring-94de74@sudeepholla> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 10:39:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The SCMI protocol specification says that the PINCTRL_REQUEST and > PINCTRL_RELEASE commands are optional. So if the SCMI server returns > -EOPNOTSUPP, then treat that as success and continue. > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla I see Linus W has provided review tags too. Though I am assuming it will go via some other tree as SCMI core change is tiny, just wanted to check it explicitly so that there is no wrong assumption on my side. -- Regards, Sudeep