From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
To: "Kevin Hilman (TI)" <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pmdomain: arm_scmi: add support for domain hierarchies
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:37:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260313120707.jhkyd772wzuwmlhd@lcpd911> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310-topic-lpm-pmdomain-child-ids-v1-3-5361687a18ff@baylibre.com>
On Mar 10, 2026 at 17:19:25 -0700, Kevin Hilman (TI) wrote:
> After primary SCMI pmdomain is created, use new of_genpd helper which
> checks for child domain mappings defined in power-domains-child-ids.
>
> Also remove any child domain mappings when SCMI domain is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman (TI) <khilman@baylibre.com>
> ---
Again, since it worked fine on my AM62L,
Tested-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
But I had some thoughts further down...
> drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c b/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c
> index b5e2ffd5ea64..9d8faef44aa9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,14 @@ static int scmi_pm_domain_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
>
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, scmi_pd_data);
>
> + /*
> + * Parse (optional) power-domains-child-ids property to
> + * establish parent-child relationships
> + */
> + ret = of_genpd_add_child_ids(np, scmi_pd_data);
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT)
> + pr_err("Failed to parse power-domains-child-ids for %pOF: %d\n", np, ret);
Nit: I think the style of this driver is to use dev_err than pr_err
Also, maybe a dev_warn makes more sense since we're not even returning
the error or doing anything different if we get certain error path.
I am wondering if it makes sense to just abort the whole idea of
creating power-domain child ids if anything goes wrong?
Basically just of_genpd_remove_child_ids if we face a condition where we
have different number of parents/ children or id > num etc...
All are error cases where the system behaviour can go on to become very
unpredictable if we end up making a false/ incomplete parent-child ID
map.
Thoughts?
PS.
If we go on to do a of_genpd_remove_child_ids here incase of failure then it makes sense to
scream a dev_err here.
> +
> return 0;
> err_rm_genpds:
> for (i = num_domains - 1; i >= 0; i--)
> @@ -129,9 +137,13 @@ static void scmi_pm_domain_remove(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> struct device *dev = &sdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>
> + scmi_pd_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /* Remove any parent-child relationships established at probe time */
> + of_genpd_remove_child_ids(np, scmi_pd_data);
> +
> of_genpd_del_provider(np);
>
> - scmi_pd_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> for (i = 0; i < scmi_pd_data->num_domains; i++) {
> if (!scmi_pd_data->domains[i])
> continue;
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
--
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole
Texas Instruments Incorporated
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 0:19 [PATCH 0/3] pmdomain: core: add support for domain hierarchies in DT Kevin Hilman (TI)
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Add power-domains-child-ids property Kevin Hilman (TI)
2026-03-11 1:38 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-03-11 21:34 ` Kevin Hilman
2026-03-24 23:25 ` Rob Herring
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] pmdomain: core: add support for power-domains-child-ids Kevin Hilman (TI)
2026-03-13 11:55 ` Dhruva Gole
2026-03-25 10:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-04-10 0:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2026-04-10 8:57 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-04-10 22:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2026-04-14 13:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] pmdomain: arm_scmi: add support for domain hierarchies Kevin Hilman (TI)
2026-03-13 12:07 ` Dhruva Gole [this message]
2026-04-10 1:01 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260313120707.jhkyd772wzuwmlhd@lcpd911 \
--to=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox