public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: "Peter Rosin" <peda@axentia.se>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Haibo Chen" <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] pinctrl: extract pinctrl_generic_to_map() from pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map()
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 18:52:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326-concur-eel-3e0b3d91e00a@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325-pinctrl-mux-v4-3-043c2c82e623@nxp.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4227 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 07:04:12PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
> index efb39c6a670331775855efdc8566102b5c6202ef..20a216ae63e91b69985ea4cfcd0b57103c6ca950 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
> @@ -17,29 +17,18 @@
>  #include "pinctrl-utils.h"
>  #include "pinmux.h"
>  
> -static int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,

> +int
> +pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *parent,

Can you drop this stylistic change please? The 

> +		       struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps,
> +		       unsigned int *num_maps, unsigned int *num_reserved_maps,
> +		       const char **group_names, unsigned int ngroups,
> +		       const char **functions, unsigned int *pins)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = pctldev->dev;
> -	const char **functions;
> +	int npins, ret, reserve = 1;
> +	unsigned int num_configs;
>  	const char *group_name;
>  	unsigned long *configs;
> -	unsigned int num_configs, pin, *pins;
> -	int npins, ret, reserve = 1;
> -
> -	npins = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "pins");
> -
> -	if (npins < 1) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "invalid pinctrl group %pOFn.%pOFn %d\n",
> -			parent, np, npins);
> -		return npins;
> -	}
>  
>  	group_name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn.%pOFn", parent, np);
>  	if (!group_name)
> @@ -51,22 +40,6 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *p
>  	if (!pins)
>  		return -ENOMEM;

This looks suspect. You've left the pins allocation behind:
	pins = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*pins), GFP_KERNEL);
	if (!pins)
		return -ENOMEM;
but pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map() has already
populated this array before calling the function.

Also, this should probably be
Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.

>  
> -	functions = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*functions), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!functions)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	for (int i = 0; i < npins; i++) {
> -		ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "pins", i, &pin);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -
> -		pins[i] = pin;
> -
> -		ret = of_property_read_string(np, "function", &functions[i]);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -	}
> -
>  	ret = pinctrl_utils_reserve_map(pctldev, maps, num_reserved_maps, num_maps, reserve);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -103,6 +76,54 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *p
>  	return 0;
>  };
>  
> +static int
> +pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +						struct device_node *parent,
> +						struct device_node *np,
> +						struct pinctrl_map **maps,
> +						unsigned int *num_maps,
> +						unsigned int *num_reserved_maps,
> +						const char **group_names,
> +						unsigned int ngroups)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = pctldev->dev;
> +	unsigned int pin, *pins;
> +	const char **functions;
> +	int npins, ret;
> +
> +	npins = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "pins");
> +
> +	if (npins < 1) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "invalid pinctrl group %pOFn.%pOFn %d\n",
> +			parent, np, npins);
> +		return npins;
> +	}
> +
> +	pins = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*pins), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pins)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	functions = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*functions), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!functions)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (int i = 0; i < npins; i++) {
> +		ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "pins", i, &pin);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		pins[i] = pin;
> +
> +		ret = of_property_read_string(np, "function", &functions[i]);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return pinctrl_generic_to_map(pctldev, parent, np, maps, num_maps,
> +				      num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups,
> +				      functions, pins);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
>   * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-26 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-25 23:04 [PATCH v4 0/7] pinctrl: Add generic pinctrl for board-level mux chips Frank Li
2026-03-25 23:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] mux: add devm_mux_control_get_from_np() to get mux from child node Frank Li
2026-03-25 23:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add generic pinctrl for board-level mux chips Frank Li
2026-03-25 23:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] pinctrl: extract pinctrl_generic_to_map() from pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() Frank Li
2026-03-26 18:52   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-03-26 18:55     ` Conor Dooley
2026-03-26 19:47       ` Frank Li
2026-03-27  0:06         ` Conor Dooley
2026-03-27  0:09   ` Conor Dooley
2026-03-27 16:54     ` Frank Li
2026-03-27 17:14       ` Conor Dooley
2026-03-25 23:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] pinctrl: add optional .release_mux() callback Frank Li
2026-03-25 23:04 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] pinctrl: add generic board-level pinctrl driver using mux framework Frank Li
2026-03-25 23:04 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] arm64: dts: imx8mp-evk: add board-level mux for CAN2 and MICFIL Frank Li
2026-03-25 23:04 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: imx8mp-evk: add flexcan2 overlay file Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260326-concur-eel-3e0b3d91e00a@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox