From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "Nipun Gupta" <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
"Nikhil Agarwal" <nikhil.agarwal@amd.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Oleksandr Tyshchenko" <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
"Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Prakash Gupta" <prakash.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Vikash Garodia" <vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
"Charan Teja Kalla" <charan.kalla@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] of: Factor arguments passed to of_map_id() into a struct
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:19:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326161957.GA1324845@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325-parse_iommu_cells-v11-2-1fefa5c0e82c@oss.qualcomm.com>
[cc->to: Richard, Lucas for pci-imx6.c question]
On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 04:38:23PM +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> From: Charan Teja Kalla <charan.kalla@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> Change of_map_id() to take a pointer to struct of_phandle_args
> instead of passing target device node and translated IDs separately.
> Update all callers accordingly.
>
> Add an explicit filter_np parameter to of_map_id() and of_map_msi_id()
> to separate the filter input from the output. Previously, the target
> parameter served dual purpose: as an input filter (if non-NULL, only
> match entries targeting that node) and as an output (receiving the
> matched node with a reference held). Now filter_np is the explicit
> input filter and arg->np is the pure output.
>
> Previously, of_map_id() would call of_node_put() on the matched node
> when a filter was provided, making reference ownership inconsistent.
> Remove this internal of_node_put() call so that of_map_id() now always
> transfers ownership of the matched node reference to the caller via
> arg->np. Callers are now consistently responsible for releasing this
> reference with of_node_put(arg->np) when done.
> ...
Not actually part of *this* patch, and AFAICS this patch is correct
as-is, but is it necessary to have different logic around
of_node_put() for imx_pcie_add_lut_by_rid() and
apple_pcie_enable_device()?
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -1137,6 +1137,8 @@ static void imx_pcie_remove_lut(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, u16 rid)
>
> static int imx_pcie_add_lut_by_rid(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, u32 rid)
> {
> + struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = {};
> + struct of_phandle_args msi_spec = {};
> struct device *dev = imx_pcie->pci->dev;
> struct device_node *target;
> u32 sid_i, sid_m;
> @@ -1144,7 +1146,12 @@ static int imx_pcie_add_lut_by_rid(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, u32 rid)
> u32 sid = 0;
>
> target = NULL;
> - err_i = of_map_iommu_id(dev->of_node, rid, &target, &sid_i);
> + err_i = of_map_iommu_id(dev->of_node, rid, &iommu_spec);
> + if (!err_i) {
> + target = iommu_spec.np;
> + sid_i = iommu_spec.args[0];
> + }
> +
> if (target) {
> of_node_put(target);
Here it's conditional on "target" even though of_node_put() checks
internally for non-NULL, so it would be safe without the conditional
here.
> } else {
> @@ -1156,8 +1163,11 @@ static int imx_pcie_add_lut_by_rid(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, u32 rid)
> err_i = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - target = NULL;
> - err_m = of_map_msi_id(dev->of_node, rid, &target, &sid_m);
> + err_m = of_map_msi_id(dev->of_node, rid, NULL, &msi_spec);
> + if (!err_m) {
> + target = msi_spec.np;
> + sid_m = msi_spec.args[0];
> + }
>
> /*
> * err_m target
And here (outside the diff context) we also call of_node_put()
conditionally:
...
else if (target)
of_node_put(target);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> index a0937b7b3c4d..c2cffc0659f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> @@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ static int apple_pcie_enable_device(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, struct pci_d
> {
> u32 sid, rid = pci_dev_id(pdev);
> struct apple_pcie_port *port;
> + struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = {};
> int idx, err;
>
> port = apple_pcie_get_port(pdev);
> @@ -764,10 +765,12 @@ static int apple_pcie_enable_device(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, struct pci_d
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "added to bus %s, index %d\n",
> pci_name(pdev->bus->self), port->idx);
>
> - err = of_map_iommu_id(port->pcie->dev->of_node, rid, NULL, &sid);
> + err = of_map_iommu_id(port->pcie->dev->of_node, rid, &iommu_spec);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + of_node_put(iommu_spec.np);
Here we call of_node_put() unconditionally.
I think it would be much nicer if imx_pcie_add_lut_by_rid() used the
same style as apple_pcie_enable_device() and did the of_node_put()
unconditionally. That would untangle the function a bit and make it
easier to analyze.
> + sid = iommu_spec.args[0];
> mutex_lock(&port->pcie->lock);
>
> idx = bitmap_find_free_region(port->sid_map, port->sid_map_sz, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-25 11:08 [PATCH v11 0/3] of: parsing of multi #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps Vijayanand Jitta
2026-03-25 11:08 ` [PATCH v11 1/3] of: Add convenience wrappers for of_map_id() Vijayanand Jitta
2026-03-25 11:08 ` [PATCH v11 2/3] of: Factor arguments passed to of_map_id() into a struct Vijayanand Jitta
2026-03-26 16:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-03-27 9:35 ` Vijayanand Jitta
2026-03-25 11:08 ` [PATCH v11 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps Vijayanand Jitta
2026-03-26 5:53 ` [PATCH v11 0/3] of: parsing of multi " Vijayanand Jitta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260326161957.GA1324845@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=charan.kalla@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nikhil.agarwal@amd.com \
--cc=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=prakash.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox