public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com>
To: jassisinghbrar@gmail.com
Cc: andersson@kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org,
	joonwonkang@google.com,  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  maz@kernel.org,
	shawn.guo@linaro.org, tglx@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: Fix NULL message support in mbox_send_message()
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:08:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331100816.2222507-1-joonwonkang@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260327220040.53326-1-jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>

> The active_req field serves double duty as both the "is a TX in
> flight" flag (NULL means idle) and the storage for the in-flight
> message pointer. When a client sends NULL via mbox_send_message(),
> active_req is set to NULL, which the framework misinterprets as
> "no active request". This breaks the TX state machine by:
> 
>  - tx_tick() short-circuits on (!mssg), skipping the tx_done
>    callback and the tx_complete completion
>  - txdone_hrtimer() skips the channel entirely since active_req
>    is NULL, so poll-based TX-done detection never fires.
> 
> Fix this by introducing a MBOX_NO_MSG sentinel value that means
> "no active request," freeing NULL to be valid message data. The
> sentinel is defined in the subsystem-internal mailbox.h so that
> controller drivers within drivers/mailbox/ can reference it, but
> it is not exposed to clients outside the subsystem.
> 
> Fifteen in-tree callers send NULL (doorbell-style IPCs on Qualcomm,
> Tegra, TI, Xilinx, i.MX, SCMI, and PCC platforms). All were
> audited for regression:
> 
>  - Most already work around the bug via knows_txdone=true with a
>    manual mbox_client_txdone() call, making the framework's
>    tracking irrelevant. These are unaffected.
> 
>  - Poll-based callers (Xilinx zynqmp/r5) are strictly better off:
>    the poll timer now correctly detects NULL-active channels
>    instead of silently skipping them.
> 
>  - irq-qcom-mpm.c was a pre-existing bug -- the only Qualcomm
>    caller that omitted the knows_txdone + mbox_client_txdone()
>    pattern. Fixed in a companion commit ("irqchip/qcom-mpm: Fix
>    missing mailbox TX done acknowledgment").
> 
>  - No caller sets both a tx_done callback and sends NULL, nor
>    combines tx_block=true with NULL sends, so the newly reachable
>    callback/completion paths are never exercised.
> 
> Also update tegra-hsp's flush callback, which directly inspects
> active_req to wait for the channel to drain: the old "!= NULL"
> check becomes "!= MBOX_NO_MSG", otherwise flush spins until
> timeout since the sentinel is non-NULL.
> 
> The only tradeoff is that 'MBOX_NO_MSG' can not be used as a message
> by clients.
> 
> Reported-by: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>

Do you have plans to backport this patch to other stable versions?
If not, I can send the backport for you to the stable versions that are in my needs.

Thanks,
Joonwon Kang


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-27 22:00 [PATCH] mailbox: Fix NULL message support in mbox_send_message() jassisinghbrar
2026-03-29 16:33 ` Jassi Brar
2026-03-31 10:08 ` Joonwon Kang [this message]
2026-04-01  5:07   ` Jassi Brar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-22 17:17 jassisinghbrar
2026-03-23  5:13 ` Joonwon Kang
2026-03-23 14:57   ` Jassi Brar
2026-03-23 15:43     ` Joonwon Kang
2026-03-27 20:24 ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260331100816.2222507-1-joonwonkang@google.com \
    --to=joonwonkang@google.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox