From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Jie Gan <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@arm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Tingwei Zhang <tingwei.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: tpdm: fix invalid MMIO access issue
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 09:10:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260407081048.GJ356832@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260407-fix-potential-issue-in-tpdm-v1-1-42090d27c0a8@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 12:47:11PM +0800, Jie Gan wrote:
> Create the csdev_access struct only when a valid MMIO resource is
> available. In tpdm_probe(), base is uninitialized for static TPDM
> instances that lack an MMIO resource, causing csdev_access to be
> created with a garbage address and potentially leading to
> unexpected issues.
This patch itself is fine for me. However, I am wandering if this
is sufficient.
As mentioned "potentially leading to unexpected issues", can I
understand some code pieces access register with uninitialized base?
If so, you would also explictly add coresight_is_static_tpdm() to
prevent register access.
Thanks,
Leo
> Fixes: 14ae052f7947 ("coresight: tpdm: add static tpdm support")
> Signed-off-by: Jie Gan <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
> index 9b16f368a58b..eaf7210af648 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
> @@ -1430,6 +1430,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *res)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + desc.access = CSDEV_ACCESS_IOMEM(base);
> if (tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
> of_property_read_u32(drvdata->dev->of_node,
> "qcom,dsb-msrs-num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
> @@ -1452,7 +1453,6 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *res)
> desc.ops = &tpdm_cs_ops;
> desc.pdata = dev->platform_data;
> desc.dev = dev;
> - desc.access = CSDEV_ACCESS_IOMEM(base);
> if (res)
> desc.groups = tpdm_attr_grps;
> else
>
> ---
> base-commit: 816f193dd0d95246f208590924dd962b192def78
> change-id: 20260407-fix-potential-issue-in-tpdm-b07b44416051
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Jie Gan <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 4:47 [PATCH] coresight: tpdm: fix invalid MMIO access issue Jie Gan
2026-04-07 8:10 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-04-07 8:33 ` Jie Gan
2026-04-07 10:35 ` Leo Yan
2026-04-07 10:59 ` Jie Gan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260407081048.GJ356832@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tingwei.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox