public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] perf: Fix uninitialized bitfields in perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields()
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 15:28:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260409142803.GS356832@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318171706.2840512-3-puranjay@kernel.org>

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 10:16:56AM -0700, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() zeroes individual bitfields of struct
> perf_branch_entry but misses the new_type (4 bits) and priv (3 bits)
> fields. This means any code path that relies on this function to produce
> a clean entry may expose stale or uninitialised data in these fields to
> userspace.
> 
> The function was introduced by commit bfe4daf850f4 ("perf/core: Add
> perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() helper") specifically to "centralize
> the initialization to avoid missing a field in case more are added."
> Unfortunately, the commits that later added new_type and priv to struct
> perf_branch_entry only updated the UAPI header and did not update this
> clearing function.
> 
> Zero new_type and priv alongside the other bitfields.
> 
> Fixes: b190bc4ac9e6 ("perf: Extend branch type classification")
> Fixes: 5402d25aa571 ("perf: Capture branch privilege information")
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 48d851fbd8ea..d7f39b7e9cda 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -1481,6 +1481,8 @@ static inline void perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(struct perf_branch_entry *b
>  	br->cycles	= 0;
>  	br->type	= 0;
>  	br->spec	= PERF_BR_SPEC_NA;
> +	br->new_type	= 0;
> +	br->priv	= 0;
>  	br->reserved	= 0;
>  }

We already know this does not work well. Instead, we can define a union
for bitfield and use memset to clear it, later we will not bother for
this kind of issue anymore.

  struct perf_branch_entry {
          ...
  
          union {
                  struct {
                          __u64   mispred   :  1, /* target mispredicted */
                                  predicted :  1, /* target predicted */
                                  ...
                                  reserved  : 31;
                  };
                  __u64 bitfields;
          };
  };

static inline void perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(struct perf_branch_entry *br)
{
        memset(&br->bitfields, 0, sizeof(br->bitfields));
}

Thanks,
Leo


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-09 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-18 17:16 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Add BRBE support for bpf_get_branch_snapshot() Puranjay Mohan
2026-03-18 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf/arm_pmuv3: Fix NULL pointer dereference in armv8pmu_sched_task() Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-08 12:23   ` Usama Arif
2026-04-09 11:24   ` Leo Yan
2026-04-09 11:30     ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-03-18 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf: Fix uninitialized bitfields in perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-09 14:28   ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-04-09 16:28   ` Leo Yan
2026-03-18 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf/arm64: Add BRBE support for bpf_get_branch_snapshot() Puranjay Mohan
2026-03-18 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Adjust wasted entries threshold for ARM64 BRBE Puranjay Mohan
2026-03-26  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Add BRBE support for bpf_get_branch_snapshot() Puranjay Mohan
2026-03-26 11:01   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260409142803.GS356832@e132581.arm.com \
    --to=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox