Re: [GIT PULL] firmware: arm_ffa: Fix for v7.1

[Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>]

On Sat, Apr 11, 2026 at 10:49:50AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 11:08:39AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Hi ARM SoC Team,
> > 
> > Please pull ! This is the only fix/update I have at the moment for v7.1
> > So, I am sending it early as fix but late as an update for v7.1.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep
> > 
> > -->8
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 6de23f81a5e08be8fbf5e8d7e9febc72a5b5f27f:
> > 
> >   Linux 7.0-rc1 (2026-02-22 13:18:59 -0800)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git tags/ffa-fix-7.1
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to 83210251fd70d5f96bcdc8911e15f7411a6b2463:
> > 
> >   firmware: arm_ffa: Use the correct buffer size during RXTX_MAP (2026-04-07 10:47:42 +0100)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Arm FF-A fix for v7.1
> > 
> > Use the page aligned backing allocation size when computing the RXTX_MAP
> > page count. This fixes FF-A RX/TX buffer registration on kernels built
> > with 16K/64K PAGE_SIZE, where alloc_pages_exact() backs the buffer with a
> > larger aligned span than the discovered minimum buffer size.
> 
> Can we avoid per-driver trees or pulls? You do maintain also ARM SCMI
> firmware driver, so this could be sent together? I think you also use
> the same Git tree, right?
> 

Sure, I can put all of the firmware drivers I maintain together. I had
for some reason assumed individual PR is preferred.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep