From: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
To: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"Rich Felker" <dalias@aerifal.cx>,
"Torvald Riegel" <triegel@redhat.com>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Uros Bizjak" <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-dev@igalia.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] arm64: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 15:55:59 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260424-tonyk-robust_arm-v2-0-db4e46f752cf@igalia.com> (raw)
Hi folks,
This is my take on implementing the new vDSO for unlocking a robust futex in
arm64. If you don't know what's that, Thomas wrote a good summary,
including the motivation for this work and the x86 implementation:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/878qb89g7b.ffs@tglx/
There are some loose ends in my patchset so I'm sending as a RFC to ask
some questions:
- If the process is interrupted between the labels, we need to check the
conditional flags and clear the op_pending address from the register. Using
objdump I see that op_pending addr is being stored at x2, but I suspect that
this isn't stable, so I need to figure out how to make sure that the address
will always be stored in the same register.
- So far I have implemented only the LL/SC version to make review easier, but I
can do the LSE version as well.
This patchset works fine with the tests proposed at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260330120118.012924430@kernel.org/
Changes from v1:
- s/CONFIG_COMPAT/CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO (Thomas Weißschuh)
- Fixed linker not finding the symbols (Thomas Weißschuh)
v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260417-tonyk-robust_arm-v1-0-03aa64e2ff1a@igalia.com
---
André Almeida (2):
arm64: vdso: Prepare for robust futex unlock support
arm64: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/futex_robust.h | 35 +++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c | 30 +++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 9 +++-
arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 11 ++++
.../kernel/vdso/vfutex_robust_list_try_unlock.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
base-commit: 0e8896e9899b607bb168c1cce340596b8c2e3e2b
change-id: 20260416-tonyk-robust_arm-54ff77d2c4e4
Best regards,
--
André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 18:55 André Almeida [this message]
2026-04-24 18:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] arm64: vdso: Prepare for robust futex unlock support André Almeida
2026-04-26 18:07 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-04-27 16:20 ` André Almeida
2026-04-26 19:04 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-04-24 18:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/2] arm64: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() André Almeida
2026-04-26 18:30 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-04-27 16:26 ` André Almeida
2026-04-27 16:48 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-04-28 11:00 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260424-tonyk-robust_arm-v2-0-db4e46f752cf@igalia.com \
--to=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dalias@aerifal.cx \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=triegel@redhat.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox