public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
	"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: mt6359: fix unchecked return value in mt6358_read_imp
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:15:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427181537.46c2f20a@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae9JFucpXBPwwGzr@pc>

On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:31:34 +0100
Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 12:14:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:54:57AM +0100, Salah Triki wrote:  
> > > In mt6358_read_imp(), the return value of regmap_read() is currently
> > > ignored. This is problematic because if the bus read fails the variable
> > > val_v remains uninitialized.
> > > 
> > > The function subsequently assigns this uninitialized stack value to
> > > *vbat, leading to incorrect measurement results being reported to
> > > the IIO subsystem without any error indication.
> > > 
> > > Update the function to check the return value of regmap_read(). Ensure
> > > that mt6358_stop_imp_conv() is still called to clean up the hardware
> > > state before returning the error code.  
> > 
> > Sounds like this deserves a Fixes tag, but the problem is that the whole driver
> > is written like this. Why does having this fixed make it special?
> > 
> > -- 
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> > 
> >   
> 
> You are right, Andy. I noticed that several other functions in this driver
> share the same issue. I will send a V2 that addresses all unchecked
> regmap_read() calls in this file and I will include the Fixes tag. Thanks
> for the feedback.
What's the bus in this case?

Whilst maybe we should be checking them, it is not uncommon to forgo those
checks in internal busses.  In general they should be more reliable than
something going over PCB tracks like spi or i2c.

I'd be tempted to fix the uninitialized variable by setting it at declaration
rather than worry too much about checking all the regmap return values.

> 
> Best Regards
> Salah Triki



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-27 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-27  8:54 [PATCH] iio: adc: mt6359: fix unchecked return value in mt6358_read_imp Salah Triki
2026-04-27  9:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-27 11:31   ` Salah Triki
2026-04-27 17:15     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-27 16:51 Salah Triki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260427181537.46c2f20a@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=salah.triki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox