From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6D1CD3447 for ; Sat, 9 May 2026 20:24:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=JQ8o3NwYNG+FSE8c2GdyR3sj/We0W1HgEtNlRdVdUJY=; b=fEsorn3c8ZQXUhvmcErpDUHfVl AHjwXW/5uVI5eGIFlEaCYwEbjGO9udYBAhcIf7KTEGPwzRBsA3L+4e5wNyDmu6czLDtES8maezEM6 yMndRvUjUBRTgJTlnPnACDerTjjhk5O6nZT10BGkR87H7aCTbtD6YDwVwVU1Flcdvx+B+lEtErwnS Fv/MXCFcp5fqvd8I9x+euc5PfFKtk6PMXn6BiDwAHyJc57u7t3NGMU/jJpwkJe6x02jCfVs4IihgE fjQ0+9L+CJDvBR4IelgBfE3A7A8RGs58LMQn/uq6lKsmF8L6FQggxWAsUN83qw32TV7fl7e8r7Ixk gxd21I0Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wLoE6-00000009bf9-3ryl; Sat, 09 May 2026 20:24:42 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wLoE5-00000009bey-47i6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 09 May 2026 20:24:42 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB5F60121; Sat, 9 May 2026 20:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F57EC2BCB2; Sat, 9 May 2026 20:24:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778358280; bh=kKWh3Ax64/du+5vhX0vAjVHPv0l4sBuI+ks7VTd/Lkw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=shZOE2pVpx5LAwKbDSqYjkqU3e5ZgIBDTpaNBPpdxKFnn7hy81myAkpSA+zI1NOjy +lCtIM2W21mDt+l3OF+B+pL6zjn3w28574nppg08u0KqlgRXdvAkRbO0G0oWB1uOto jurZzH1+Cd/vfNOQTM9pKWMYYNG4HiO8Sh0B55lhaS4+rgi07zTcEBESprQlU41IE4 vFiUSg49UFiqrg3tyQkj6J+wmzNc6SyfV+8nCiAnTOkcEi8iLsgzKaJMAahzCtfg77 2MaiR67kIZf0F5sTVlTruJXAgamxbEsnq9e5QVxG+RGOtuUl5FVZyf2t/vtmBZqubE M9kJNzwTG944g== Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 13:23:54 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] lib/raid6: Include asm/neon-intrinsics.h rather than arm_neon.h Message-ID: <20260509202354.GD11883@quark> References: <20260422171655.3437334-10-ardb+git@google.com> <20260422171655.3437334-17-ardb+git@google.com> <20260423074712.GC31018@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260423074712.GC31018@lst.de> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 09:47:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > From: Ard Biesheuvel > > > > arm_neon.h is a compiler header which needs some scaffolding to work > > correctly in the linux context, and so it is better not to include it > > directly. Both ARM and arm64 now provide asm/neon-intrinsics.h which > > takes care of this. > > > This could potentially clash with the raid6 library rework I'm doing > for 7.2. Although git has become pretty good about renamed files, so > maybe it won't be so bad. > I think this patch also breaks the userspace build of lib/raid6/. Which is going away in Christoph's series anyway, but maybe it would make sense to drop this patch (and patch 8 which depends on this, I think) from this series for now? That would make it a bit easier to take the rest through crc-next. - Eric