From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <oleg@redhat.com>,
<tglx@kernel.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>, <luto@kernel.org>,
<kees@kernel.org>, <wad@chromium.org>, <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
<linusw@kernel.org>, <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, <ldv@strace.io>,
<thuth@redhat.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>, <song@kernel.org>,
<ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
<pengcan@kylinos.cn>, <liqiang01@kylinos.cn>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v15 01/11] entry: Fix potential syscall truncation in syscall_trace_enter()
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 17:20:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260511092103.1974980-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511092103.1974980-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
In syscall_trace_enter(), the current logic returns "ret ? : syscall".
While __secure_computing() currently only returns 0 (allow) or -1 (kill),
this "ret ? : syscall" pattern is conceptually flawed.
If __secure_computing() were to return a non-zero value that isn't -1, it
would unintentionally override the actual system call number. This logic
is redundant because if seccomp denies the syscall, the execution path
should already be handled by the caller based on the error return, rather
than conflating the return code with the syscall number.
Fix it by explicitly returning the syscall number. This ensures
the syscall register remains untainted by the trace return values and
aligns with the expectation that seccomp-related interceptions are
handled via the -1 return status.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Fixes: 142781e108b1 ("entry: Provide generic syscall entry functionality")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/entry-common.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/entry-common.h b/include/linux/entry-common.h
index 416a3352261f..462a51fc044d 100644
--- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
+++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static __always_inline long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned l
syscall_enter_audit(regs, syscall);
- return ret ? : syscall;
+ return syscall;
}
/**
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 9:20 [PATCH v15 00/11] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:20 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-05-11 9:20 ` [PATCH v15 02/11] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit() to accept flags parameter Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:20 ` [PATCH v15 03/11] arm64/ptrace: Use syscall_get_nr() helper for syscall_trace_enter() Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:20 ` [PATCH v15 04/11] arm64/ptrace: Expand secure_computing() in place Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:20 ` [PATCH v15 05/11] arm64/ptrace: Use syscall_get_arguments() helper for audit Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:20 ` [PATCH v15 06/11] arm64: ptrace: Move rseq_syscall() before audit_syscall_exit() Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:20 ` [PATCH v15 07/11] arm64: syscall: Introduce syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work() Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:21 ` [PATCH v15 08/11] arm64/ptrace: Define and use _TIF_SYSCALL_EXIT_WORK Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:21 ` [PATCH v15 09/11] arm64/ptrace: Skip syscall exit reporting for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:21 ` [PATCH v15 10/11] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:21 ` [PATCH v15 11/11] arm64: Inline el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260511092103.1974980-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=ldv@strace.io \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqiang01@kylinos.cn \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pengcan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox