From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D682FCD4855 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 08:43:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=JAF1nzw6/257vndlPErWeOzUz3R5jMD0dIGugJMjvp4=; b=hzlY2+FLO8zyS87nfQoMiC1ehH 7HywJzpyCI50CspgxLcgvQkUEd1p756LS5ovsMxltd24hpUQzYo7akF5liqelAA9txGE1SNcNS4/T sBdXFEBoUWFBe+SR+2wzCNcz0vKDBEMivamwPMMrmyrQVB+N41kBkzq3t6qNXHhXg0925C2yC6JWF 1l5t+gETCsu7PQXNxsQLEohvg7wVgODHV1jSPoG+d9KWuXJ1X/G4DLL9CmD7UTNBRoDpgc8gB8SID pRVjLYirkwwtObH8a8JAOcOtB1LJSuvh5dUXE3IZrt/3/Gnw/FJrlqSU/Jn1a2nMRJy7pQI896nRt B8UcIXfQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wMii5-0000000G7iN-1eHq; Tue, 12 May 2026 08:43:25 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wMii2-0000000G7hg-32NX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 May 2026 08:43:23 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8831243667; Tue, 12 May 2026 08:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49133C2BCB8; Tue, 12 May 2026 08:43:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778575401; bh=AzX8yXSa8mZeuYVkhSfLL/djnjt3bTbaiv5tUdNNaGQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jXzozDCJbIXl7wFaJs7MuQDiQyfJkOPbR+omuNgM5mXfNdpDGaRgbxGyirBInMJ54 0ZSAdHYB3+4KtQLo7kQe1POLStXKQuI57EjOWQZ4HTIEjP1f+HC1j9GvFf1nn+ySh6 FdKnjUVNq0EjU4JY7lvApI3ZCuLhYQh5hYQuJVOj4PJbA3LDeFXm7PllKawyX85+LP Zp+TY3O4WBoVCsgaVjiSoyjf/2/GUFYEk7HUpEm2Tgx4TZpLFRKshL8y1oNLmA/YSc UQwt7FPYdpiQ6pqzadHTtBZyshrKemYcKDaRTs7e7IuvC4M4mXyV9gGXmAU9tFitDi lGJrgmS30Lk7w== Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 09:43:16 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Cristian Marussi , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, philip.radford@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, etienne.carriere@foss.st.com, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com, geert+renesas@glider.be, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com, Brian Masney Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/15] clk: scmi: Use new determine_rate clock operation Message-ID: <20260512-logical-tidy-pronghorn-5da394@sudeepholla> References: <20260508153300.2224715-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20260508153300.2224715-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260508153300.2224715-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260512_014322_783249_F021CE54 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.70 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 04:32:48PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Use the Clock protocol layer determine_rate logic to calculate the closest > rate that can be supported by a specific clock. > > No functional change. > Hi Stephen/Mike, I have potentially queued this and 5/15 to take it via Arm SoC unless you have any objections. It is mainly simplifying the SCMI clock driver. -- Regards, Sudeep