From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F525CD343F for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 17:06:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=GSr1Tf0ZzXk3mG4Djix4hLHmzWHNLYDR+N82KvuQvxI=; b=nOeMhX7ULz6wgj3KfDQyEGiSub ABpwttgvPC/8Q0UuTasDvxa/A/+gqvtdw6JhJbM+MthbdVYuZ3DBAWZ4uqLHJjajFqURQ1b7GKn5q OOu1RvC3ReEE+5R1+zoTfeX+UQWrC9Y/JsUXY/9+b38XoGFtUlKApyGQPzRs4IyWyPS8JIo0pdfFW tmK6+gye14cVtTJs167sw1BwAO8115QUgegzTMIlIw8KXcC/Ni+lWzX5FO1Q7NBZ+t3Zt5BlMmfHI wueBDeT1Blgb7H9hjBUIFpeUJohYbKP4tX1h7NZKnbJXgdXlW00TnQpgGr66EbsUFb9ewArKIRTnD yOXXgtwQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wMqZB-0000000HU38-1qzd; Tue, 12 May 2026 17:06:45 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wMqZ9-0000000HU09-1mPK; Tue, 12 May 2026 17:06:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1BE60132; Tue, 12 May 2026 17:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70055C2BCFB; Tue, 12 May 2026 17:06:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778605601; bh=ezfbGln1rAFroxwiTMHKaOWp+LJnHoZZM/cVb1R4ihY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jjHtIXK/1Reia9zFkZTv+Z8tndN2U01vImsudjV7gF3/4f5idlLEdWLA+ghnm/BRs doE0D43i3whpEKjdR/XEiMshzPFWw/6CDnVtU3Ss3bPeMc1Ijgn3vxiPctQtAXDhjs TYDyMF3beTwh9NqzTZqIlQfXrVe5cjDbsrMXkSurImJesRAQFXiPjE10gga6OLzPNJ IrWk58KY8jc6Jb58ACPLiXiTq1JKU6iHbyQNjGgGIYeRxw/QAWgXtWUtuOa8Wium/K 0MAZuM5Et2YgPuan1t5AkZMvKMtwKH1cZAovmO+uEN/O3GO9+g0gEeBMFXWeDtDAQ/ mmu33be+Bphkg== Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 18:06:27 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Roman Vivchar Cc: David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Andy Shevchenko , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Sen Chu , Sean Wang , Macpaul Lin , Lee Jones , Srinivas Kandagatla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Zhang Rui , Lukasz Luba , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ben Grisdale Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] dt-bindings: iio: adc: mt6359: generalize description for mt63xx series Message-ID: <20260512180627.7301b0af@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20260512-mt6323-v2-0-3efcba579e88@protonmail.com> <20260512-mt6323-v2-1-3efcba579e88@protonmail.com> <20260512141313.425535d9@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 12 May 2026 13:55:26 +0000 Roman Vivchar wrote: > On Tuesday, May 12th, 2026 at 4:13 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 May 2026 08:18:15 +0300 > > Roman Vivchar via B4 Relay wrote: > > > > > From: Roman Vivchar > > > > > > Update binding title to the MT63xx, since the list of compatibles already > > > includes mt6363 and mt6373 which don't belong to the mt6350 family. > > Hi Roman, > > > > Wild cards have a nasty habit of going wrong. I'd prefer to see > > language like: MT6359 and similar PMIC AUXADC > > Hi Jonathan, > > I agree that it would be better to specify the exact PMIC models, however > 'similar' wording might be a bit misleading here. As far as I know, > the mt6363 and mt6373 use SPMI, while mt635x (and older models, like > most of the mt63xx series) use PWRAP (a custom SPI-based protocol). > The mt6323 has an older AUXADC revision which is not compatible > with the mt635x driver. > > Would you prefer more explicit list like 'MT6323, MT6350 series, MT6363 > and MT6373 PMIC AUXADC'? It's a bit mess because some mt63xx > (like mt6333) are sub-PMICs and use I2C instead of PWRAP. Complete lists don't work because sooner or later they become too long for a title (though they should be there elsewhere in the dt-binding!) Perhaps something around: mt6359 and similar SoC ADCs including those accessed via .... > > > It is less important here than in many other places because the > > file has an explicit list soon after this, but none the less > > we've been bitten by this too often to think manufacturers won't > > throw a completely non compatible part in the middle of a wild > > card covered range. > > > > Best regards, > Roman