From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v14 24/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 14:17:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513131757.116630-25-steven.price@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513131757.116630-1-steven.price@arm.com>
MMIO emulation for a realm cannot be done directly with the VM's
registers as they are protected from the host. However, for emulatable
data aborts, the RMM uses GPRS[0] to provide the read/written value.
We can transfer this from/to the equivalent VCPU's register entry and
then depend on the generic MMIO handling code in KVM.
For a MMIO read, the value is placed in the shared RecExit structure
during kvm_handle_mmio_return() rather than in the VCPU's register
entry.
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
Changes since v7:
* New comment for rec_exit_sync_dabt() explaining the call to
vcpu_set_reg().
Changes since v5:
* Inject SEA to the guest is an emulatable MMIO access triggers a data
abort.
* kvm_handle_mmio_return() - disable kvm_incr_pc() for a REC (as the PC
isn't under the host's control) and move the REC_ENTER_EMULATED_MMIO
flag setting to this location (as that tells the RMM to skip the
instruction).
---
arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c | 4 +++-
arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
index 89982bd3345f..6492397b73d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
@@ -228,7 +228,9 @@ static void inject_abt32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_pabt, u32 addr)
static void __kvm_inject_sea(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool iabt, u64 addr)
{
- if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu))
+ if (unlikely(vcpu_is_rec(vcpu)))
+ vcpu->arch.rec.run->enter.flags |= REC_ENTER_FLAG_INJECT_SEA;
+ else if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu))
inject_abt32(vcpu, iabt, addr);
else
inject_abt64(vcpu, iabt, addr);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c
index e2285ed8c91d..6a8cb927fcca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
+#include <asm/rmi_smc.h>
#include <trace/events/kvm.h>
#include "trace.h"
@@ -138,14 +139,21 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ, len, run->mmio.phys_addr,
&data);
data = vcpu_data_host_to_guest(vcpu, data, len);
- vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu), data);
+
+ if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
+ vcpu->arch.rec.run->enter.gprs[0] = data;
+ else
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu), data);
}
/*
* The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
* in the guest.
*/
- kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
+ if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
+ vcpu->arch.rec.run->enter.flags |= REC_ENTER_FLAG_EMULATED_MMIO;
+ else
+ kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
return 1;
}
@@ -167,14 +175,14 @@ int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa)
* No valid syndrome? Ask userspace for help if it has
* volunteered to do so, and bail out otherwise.
*
- * In the protected VM case, there isn't much userspace can do
+ * In the protected/realm VM case, there isn't much userspace can do
* though, so directly deliver an exception to the guest.
*/
if (!kvm_vcpu_dabt_isvalid(vcpu)) {
trace_kvm_mmio_nisv(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), esr,
kvm_vcpu_get_hfar(vcpu), fault_ipa);
- if (vcpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+ if (vcpu_is_protected(vcpu) || vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
return kvm_inject_sea_dabt(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_get_hfar(vcpu));
if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_RETURN_NISV_IO_ABORT_TO_USER,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c
index e7c51b6cf6ce..8ec0d179eba2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c
@@ -25,6 +25,20 @@ static int rec_exit_reason_notimpl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int rec_exit_sync_dabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
+
+ /*
+ * In the case of a write, copy over gprs[0] to the target GPR,
+ * preparing to handle MMIO write fault. The content to be written has
+ * been saved to gprs[0] by the RMM (even if another register was used
+ * by the guest). In the case of normal memory access this is redundant
+ * (the guest will replay the instruction), but the overhead is
+ * minimal.
+ */
+ if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(vcpu) && kvm_vcpu_dabt_isvalid(vcpu))
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu),
+ rec->run->exit.gprs[0]);
+
return kvm_handle_guest_abort(vcpu);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 13:17 [PATCH v14 00/44] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 01/44] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 02/44] kvm: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 03/44] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 04/44] arm64: RMI: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 05/44] arm64: RMI: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 06/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at init Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 07/44] arm64: RMI: Configure the RMM with the host's page size Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 08/44] arm64: RMI: Ensure that the RMM has GPT entries for memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 09/44] arm64: RMI: Provide functions to delegate/undelegate ranges of memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 10/44] arm64: RMI: Add support for SRO Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 11/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at KVM init Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 12/44] arm64: RMI: Check for LPA2 support Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 13/44] arm64: RMI: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 14/44] arm64: RMI: Basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 15/44] kvm: arm64: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 16/44] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 17/44] arm64: RMI: RTT tear down Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 18/44] arm64: RMI: Activate realm on first VCPU run Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 19/44] arm64: RMI: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 20/44] arm64: RMI: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 21/44] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 22/44] arm64: RMI: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 23/44] arm64: RMI: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` Steven Price [this message]
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 25/44] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 26/44] arm64: RMI: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 27/44] arm64: RMI: Set RIPAS of initial memslots Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 28/44] arm64: RMI: Create the realm descriptor Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 29/44] arm64: RMI: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 30/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 31/44] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 32/44] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 33/44] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 34/44] arm64: RMI: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 35/44] arm64: RMI: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 36/44] arm64: RMI: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 37/44] arm64: RMI: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 38/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 39/44] arm64: RMI: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 40/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 41/44] arm64: RMI: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 42/44] arm64: RMI: Provide register list for unfinalized RMI RECs Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 43/44] arm64: RMI: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 44/44] arm64: RMI: Enable realms to be created Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513131757.116630-25-steven.price@arm.com \
--to=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm.com \
--cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox