From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CABCD4F39 for ; Thu, 14 May 2026 06:44:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Rvs7i0m2mkFEM33dw5Pxs+v6bQPAjwc2DIz49z/H1v8=; b=t3YeKtGUOacMUUb5Dj+fEZ9bf0 QSWFS3DqRJRwBC9rChbIdCmCZpYB/SJ8u12MrgH3xPIlfVclp6J66YxBVrr0CIlQ7akiBB1eYDVdu s/r1wrPht5P2bxjZgeSrUfZ00FvGmFnNDaFUVSOYSDgRK+QTmnqjEhbNO26KwpZbqJnXMAe9BHNhc YC0HN6sLI4fDti8yk0V4nqyEkARYLfoXUvgYCGuye1FLuM+uKYTMSeZxc8ObkSZPj8AGNxss2NR8h oiNlHuWXmsxsbhIFM516uF1PvJqVscQ5hLPoiVbeEt4/+Xaqz1fJDfkUN4R2JxqXpva8PbqbKNuK3 wjbleRZg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wNPnc-00000004jzq-26tj; Thu, 14 May 2026 06:44:00 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wNPnb-00000004jzg-1G3x for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 14 May 2026 06:43:59 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26574600AE; Thu, 14 May 2026 06:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EEDEC2BCB7; Thu, 14 May 2026 06:43:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778741037; bh=z4iol9lK0tCBS7gF375F2wgexcgoZs/yOTdmOdhJrT8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Eqb8nqJRD4jn8FUHLZb1zwzarUwB4NXIhnDJ5PXTpnFHWgPdxLXzWOxNiqTvn1dxz 9rVAASvmP0A334BlZgTwN8EljEGAkxucD2GVY/BbOLLyFmrWHVhx/VHk+xv47u3q+y 1WiADo//KfcdSKqvkwyHzxAIC+WuaZ7btXRjGTr5l7G8FxrBmZiTnqLxfTOCUf3hag 6MUCNPcLLac1RM4IYOGp/0xShHU+vbukrN86N3yMcl+PQOFhn5Oma5+Zu8zXOUGlU5 BNqjnQKD4aaBKc+wMFZ+YwAYc4M01+/41ln8ozk2JMZ6fZiTg/6K9Fd2O81QLeLu9M Q9B7DCbpfbadw== Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 08:43:55 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Josua Mayer Cc: Shawn Guo , Li Yang , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Li , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Yazan Shhady , Jon Nettleton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add solidrun lx2160a twins board Message-ID: <20260514-macho-white-tapir-4f8cf2@quoll> References: <20260512-lx2160-pci-v6-0-d0ff72d3c983@solid-run.com> <20260512-lx2160-pci-v6-5-d0ff72d3c983@solid-run.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260512-lx2160-pci-v6-5-d0ff72d3c983@solid-run.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 04:39:00PM +0200, Josua Mayer wrote: > The SolidRun LX2160A Twins board supports two configurations, one with > with a sinle CEX-7 module, and one with two (dual). > > The dual configuration was not yet tested. And how do see dual configuration? New compatible? For the same hardware (the same because from SoC point of view it will be exactly the same)? You must post complete binding, otherwise this feels risky and when you actually try running dual configuration you will see that existing binding makes no sense. Best regards, Krzysztof