From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E9ACD4851 for ; Fri, 15 May 2026 06:51:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=zNXrkpjb95Fb/sxYhbSDF3NO+ETSzgTr5Jqs1ZfQwus=; b=byh1MAe6neLSquxs/wx11/RUkk HLdwWovCAzEGPMHdeWvwYbSHKNs0rTcfJJIwntgHdbBaJiVhSxNcc7yenMwD1xe0APcn19Ba0uUgL q7V3fnyAnpva5+/eMkMeim2jrShBnGD0K2Ps2In+NEX4oClgvTWJHiIJcb45VYiAZ/z8T1hTJbO3A 7hvGYGwYY3sHubHsoELv6FdAudNlBsEU0h5Jx3oVOjimK40pfUuEsXgrODC6FVDDShu+C4bIB/Bj/ GW24UHTVHrI+gSrY/pRa8hyKijUu482w+eVlc1pQTyXWENvFrw8Pt7anMt9yyVUTwychn76Y5SHW1 7pAAKumA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wNmOf-00000007Y7n-265D; Fri, 15 May 2026 06:51:46 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wNmOe-00000007Y7M-2BLw for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 May 2026 06:51:44 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0161260581; Fri, 15 May 2026 06:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B52DC2BCB0; Fri, 15 May 2026 06:51:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778827903; bh=xetCbQQicxOnxA/cAWCBNjO1sljv2AqnFgNenly9yms=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=krXJuO9ndCrzCUWxfwt6siUoaECBWzO7J6x035a9dcURhIVBefNNnH4pZUv2aKhf3 80KyKhGxol1OUXWU4jwiqFj6ZfRQ+21TaszZO/xevTwbwbrrOYL0tpcTfVlTOAH/wx V7/j2I8tIZ1Ifxi/wzYtObXtCHRVF9OUrkkMJCteQ9FDsltRuESAIMQdPY5BWlBeec a60j3O88yB6W3BoAmEcmsyostQgj9CfXIXUg/RpSeb2FzK2Tq4HYBRiHDCEpTdqzJg WeEZouBq5ijvovq6UCrDlC+eH+qPOjS9M0BFRZU+jqjdJxQ6ENrZsgh30yLaqFwkz3 Y22hpb8m1qeWg== Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 08:51:41 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Lee Jones , Aradhya Bhatia , Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra , Swamil Jain , Devarsh Thakkar , Louis Chauvet , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Simplify binding Message-ID: <20260515-hidden-devout-numbat-dc6c9e@quoll> References: <20260513-beagley-ai-display-v2-0-9e9bcefde6bc@ideasonboard.com> <20260513-beagley-ai-display-v2-2-9e9bcefde6bc@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260513-beagley-ai-display-v2-2-9e9bcefde6bc@ideasonboard.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 04:17:24PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > In principle the DT binding for the DSS IP should mainly cover the DSS > IP. The current binding also covers the SoC integration topics outside > the DSS, mainly via the endpoint related rules and descriptions. > > A more recent SoC, AM62P, has two instances of the DSS IP, and while > both DSS IPs are identical, they are integrated slightly differently > (e.g. which DSS output goes to an in-SoC DSI bridge, which goes to > DPI pins, etc.). > > To make the bindings usable for both DSS instances, relax the binding > slightly: remove the explicit endpoint rules, and generalize the > descriptions. > > Reviewed-by: "Rob Herring (Arm)" > Tested-by: Swamil Jain Same comments. Best regards, Krzysztof