Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
To: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	 Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	 Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: mediatek: Fix operator precedence in PCIE_FTS_NUM_L0 macro
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 10:27:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515012505.GA3166828@rocinante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515005552.2343-1-lirongqing@baidu.com>

Hello,

> The original PCIE_FTS_NUM_L0(x) macro was buggy due to improper operator
> precedence, where ((x) & 0xff << 8) was evaluated as ((x) & 0xff00).
> 
> Instead of just fixing the parentheses, use the standard FIELD_PREP()
> macro. This makes the code more robust by automatically handling masks
> and shifts, while also adding compile-time type and range checking to
> ensure the value fits within PCIE_FTS_NUM_MASK.
> 
> Fixes: 637cfacae96f ("PCI: mediatek: Add MediaTek PCIe host controller support")
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> index 7572252..00f0e29 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
>  /* MediaTek specific configuration registers */
>  #define PCIE_FTS_NUM		0x70c
>  #define PCIE_FTS_NUM_MASK	GENMASK(15, 8)
> -#define PCIE_FTS_NUM_L0(x)	((x) & 0xff << 8)
> +#define PCIE_FTS_NUM_L0(x)	FIELD_PREP(PCIE_FTS_NUM_MASK, x)

Aww.  Nice catch!  Thank you for fixing this!

Happy to offer:

  Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@kernel.org>

All the best,

	Krzysztof


      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-15  0:55 [PATCH] PCI: mediatek: Fix operator precedence in PCIE_FTS_NUM_L0 macro lirongqing
2026-05-15  1:27 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260515012505.GA3166828@rocinante \
    --to=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox