From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
will@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, korneld@google.com,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, android-kvm@google.com,
mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com, perlarsen@google.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, vdonnefort@google.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm_ffa, KVM: Fix FF-A emad offset calculations
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 14:45:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518-heavy-intelligent-partridge-ddc80b@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513-ludicrous-beautiful-cuttlefish-34271d@sudeepholla>
On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 06:23:43PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 12:44:40PM +0000, Sebastian Ene wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This series fixes the Endpoint Memory Access Descriptor (EMAD) offset calculations
> > and adds the necessary bounds checks for both the core FF-A driver and the pKVM
> > hypervisor.
> >
> > Prior to FF-A version 1.1, the memory region header didn't specify an explicit offset
> > for the EMADs, leading to the assumption that they immediately follow the header.
> > However, from v1.1 onwards, the specification dictates using the `ep_mem_offset` field
> > to determine the start of the memory access array.
> >
> > The patches in this series address this by:
> > 1. Updating the core `arm_ffa` firmware driver to correctly calculate the descriptor
> > offset using `ep_mem_offset` rather than defaulting to `sizeof(struct ffa_mem_region)`.
> > It also introduces bounds checking against `max_fragsize`.
> > 2. Enhancing the pKVM hypervisor validation logic to no longer strictly enforce that
> > the descriptor strictly follows the header, aligning it with the driver behavior
> > and the FF-A specification, while also ensuring the offset falls within the mailbox
> > buffer bounds.
> >
>
> Looks good apart from the minor nits, but how do you plan to route these
> changes as they are dependent for functionality but not for the build IIUC.
>
You can add (with minor nit fixed) my
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
if it is routed via KVM or other tree.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 12:44 [PATCH v3 0/2] arm_ffa, KVM: Fix FF-A emad offset calculations Sebastian Ene
2026-05-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] firmware: arm_ffa: Fix Endpoint Memory Access Descriptor offset calculation Sebastian Ene
2026-05-13 13:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-13 17:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2026-05-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: arm64: Validate the offset to the mem access descriptor Sebastian Ene
2026-05-13 13:53 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] arm_ffa, KVM: Fix FF-A emad offset calculations Sudeep Holla
2026-05-18 13:45 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260518-heavy-intelligent-partridge-ddc80b@sudeepholla \
--to=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=android-kvm@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=korneld@google.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=perlarsen@google.com \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox