From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 20/20] swiotlb: Preserve allocation virtual address for dynamic pools
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 09:58:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522042815.370873-21-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522042815.370873-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
swiotlb_alloc_tlb() can allocate from the DMA atomic pool when a decrypted
pool is needed from atomic context. With CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP, the
atomic pool is backed by remapped virtual addresses, which are not the same
as the direct-map addresses returned by phys_to_virt().
swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool() currently reconstructs the pool virtual address
from the physical start address. For atomic-pool backed allocations this
stores the wrong address in pool->vaddr. Later, swiotlb_free_tlb() passes
that address to dma_free_from_pool(), which will fail to recognize the
chunk
Pass the virtual address returned by the allocation path into
swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(), and store that address in pool->vaddr. This
keeps the pool free path using the same virtual address as the allocator.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 14d834ca298b..e4bd8c9eaeda 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -302,9 +302,9 @@ void __init swiotlb_update_mem_attributes(void)
}
static void swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(struct io_tlb_pool *mem, phys_addr_t start,
- unsigned long nslabs, bool late_alloc, unsigned int nareas)
+ void *vaddr, unsigned long nslabs, bool late_alloc,
+ unsigned int nareas)
{
- void *vaddr = phys_to_virt(start);
unsigned long bytes = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT, i;
mem->nslabs = nslabs;
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ void __init swiotlb_init_remap(bool addressing_limit, unsigned int flags,
return;
}
- swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(mem, __pa(tlb), nslabs, false, nareas);
+ swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(mem, __pa(tlb), tlb, nslabs, false, nareas);
add_mem_pool(&io_tlb_default_mem, mem);
if (flags & SWIOTLB_VERBOSE)
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ int swiotlb_init_late(size_t size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
}
}
- swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(mem, virt_to_phys(vstart), nslabs, true,
+ swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(mem, virt_to_phys(vstart), vstart, nslabs, true,
nareas);
add_mem_pool(&io_tlb_default_mem, mem);
@@ -664,25 +664,26 @@ static struct page *alloc_dma_pages(gfp_t gfp, size_t bytes,
* @phys_limit: Maximum allowed physical address of the buffer.
* @attrs: DMA attributes for the allocation.
* @gfp: GFP flags for the allocation.
+ * @vaddr: Receives the virtual address for the allocated buffer.
*
* Return: Allocated pages, or %NULL on allocation failure.
*/
static struct page *swiotlb_alloc_tlb(struct device *dev, size_t bytes,
- u64 phys_limit, unsigned long attrs, gfp_t gfp)
+ u64 phys_limit, unsigned long attrs, gfp_t gfp, void **vaddr)
{
struct page *page;
+ *vaddr = NULL;
+
/*
* Allocate from the atomic pools if memory is encrypted and
* the allocation is atomic, because decrypting may block.
*/
if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) && (attrs & DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED)) {
- void *vaddr;
-
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_COHERENT_POOL))
return NULL;
- return dma_alloc_from_pool(dev, bytes, &vaddr, gfp,
+ return dma_alloc_from_pool(dev, bytes, vaddr, gfp,
attrs, dma_coherent_ok);
}
@@ -705,6 +706,8 @@ static struct page *swiotlb_alloc_tlb(struct device *dev, size_t bytes,
return NULL;
}
+ if (page)
+ *vaddr = phys_to_virt(page_to_phys(page));
return page;
}
@@ -750,6 +753,7 @@ static struct io_tlb_pool *swiotlb_alloc_pool(struct device *dev,
{
struct io_tlb_pool *pool;
unsigned int slot_order;
+ void *tlb_vaddr;
struct page *tlb;
size_t pool_size;
size_t tlb_size;
@@ -767,7 +771,8 @@ static struct io_tlb_pool *swiotlb_alloc_pool(struct device *dev,
pool->unencrypted = !!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED);
tlb_size = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
- while (!(tlb = swiotlb_alloc_tlb(dev, tlb_size, phys_limit, attrs, gfp))) {
+ while (!(tlb = swiotlb_alloc_tlb(dev, tlb_size, phys_limit, attrs, gfp,
+ &tlb_vaddr))) {
if (nslabs <= minslabs)
goto error_tlb;
nslabs = ALIGN(nslabs >> 1, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
@@ -781,12 +786,12 @@ static struct io_tlb_pool *swiotlb_alloc_pool(struct device *dev,
if (!pool->slots)
goto error_slots;
- swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(pool, page_to_phys(tlb), nslabs, true, nareas);
+ swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(pool, page_to_phys(tlb), tlb_vaddr, nslabs,
+ true, nareas);
return pool;
error_slots:
- swiotlb_free_tlb(page_address(tlb), tlb_size,
- !!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED));
+ swiotlb_free_tlb(tlb_vaddr, tlb_size, !!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED));
error_tlb:
kfree(pool);
error:
@@ -1995,7 +2000,8 @@ static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem,
mem->unencrypted = false;
}
- swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(pool, rmem->base, nslabs,
+ swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(pool, rmem->base, phys_to_virt(rmem->base),
+ nslabs,
false, nareas);
mem->force_bounce = true;
mem->for_alloc = true;
--
2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 4:27 [PATCH v5 00/20] dma-mapping: Use DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED through direct, pool and swiotlb paths Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:27 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] [DO NOT MERGE] arm64/coco: Add pKVM as a CC platform Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:27 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] [DO NOT MERGE] s390: Expose protected virtualization through cc_platform_has() Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 15:35 ` JAEHOON KIM
2026-05-22 4:27 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] dma-direct: swiotlb: handle swiotlb alloc/free outside __dma_direct_alloc_pages Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:27 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] dma-direct: use DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED in alloc/free paths Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] dma-pool: track decrypted atomic pools and select them via attrs Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] dma: swiotlb: pass mapping attributes by reference Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] dma: swiotlb: track pool encryption state and honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] dma-mapping: make dma_pgprot() " Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] dma-direct: pass attrs to dma_capable() for DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED checks Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] dma-direct: make dma_direct_map_phys() honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] dma-direct: set decrypted flag for remapped DMA allocations Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] dma-direct: select DMA address encoding from DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] dma-pool: fix page leak in atomic_pool_expand() cleanup Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] dma-direct: rename ret to cpu_addr in alloc helpers Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] dma-direct: return struct page from dma_direct_alloc_from_pool() Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] iommu/dma: Check atomic pool allocation result directly Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] dma: swiotlb: free dynamic pools from process context Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] dma: swiotlb: handle set_memory_decrypted() failures Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] dma: free atomic pool pages by physical address Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-22 4:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522042815.370873-21-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox