From: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
To: broonie@kernel.org
Cc: codekipper@gmail.com, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, nichen@iscas.ac.cn, perex@perex.cz,
samuel@sholland.org, tiwai@suse.com, wens@kernel.org,
bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-spdif: Use guard() for spin locks
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 16:53:59 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522095401.72915-2-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522095401.72915-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Clean up the code using guard() for spin locks.
Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change.
Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
---
Change in v2:
- Switched from using guard() to scoped_guard()
sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-spdif.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-spdif.c b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-spdif.c
index c2ec19437cd7..89eccc83a130 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-spdif.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-spdif.c
@@ -427,24 +427,21 @@ static int sun4i_spdif_get_status(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct sun4i_spdif_dev *host = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(cpu_dai);
u8 *status = ucontrol->value.iec958.status;
- unsigned long flags;
unsigned int reg;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &host->lock) {
+ regmap_read(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCHSTA0, ®);
- regmap_read(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCHSTA0, ®);
+ status[0] = reg & 0xff;
+ status[1] = (reg >> 8) & 0xff;
+ status[2] = (reg >> 16) & 0xff;
+ status[3] = (reg >> 24) & 0xff;
- status[0] = reg & 0xff;
- status[1] = (reg >> 8) & 0xff;
- status[2] = (reg >> 16) & 0xff;
- status[3] = (reg >> 24) & 0xff;
+ regmap_read(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCHSTA1, ®);
- regmap_read(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCHSTA1, ®);
-
- status[4] = reg & 0xff;
- status[5] = (reg >> 8) & 0x3;
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
+ status[4] = reg & 0xff;
+ status[5] = (reg >> 8) & 0x3;
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -455,35 +452,32 @@ static int sun4i_spdif_set_status(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct sun4i_spdif_dev *host = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(cpu_dai);
u8 *status = ucontrol->value.iec958.status;
- unsigned long flags;
unsigned int reg;
bool chg0, chg1;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
-
- reg = (u32)status[3] << 24;
- reg |= (u32)status[2] << 16;
- reg |= (u32)status[1] << 8;
- reg |= (u32)status[0];
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &host->lock) {
+ reg = (u32)status[3] << 24;
+ reg |= (u32)status[2] << 16;
+ reg |= (u32)status[1] << 8;
+ reg |= (u32)status[0];
- regmap_update_bits_check(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCHSTA0,
- GENMASK(31,0), reg, &chg0);
+ regmap_update_bits_check(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCHSTA0,
+ GENMASK(31, 0), reg, &chg0);
- reg = (u32)status[5] << 8;
- reg |= (u32)status[4];
+ reg = (u32)status[5] << 8;
+ reg |= (u32)status[4];
- regmap_update_bits_check(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCHSTA1,
- GENMASK(9,0), reg, &chg1);
+ regmap_update_bits_check(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCHSTA1,
+ GENMASK(9, 0), reg, &chg1);
- reg = SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG_CHSTMODE;
- if (status[0] & IEC958_AES0_NONAUDIO)
- reg |= SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG_NONAUDIO;
+ reg = SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG_CHSTMODE;
+ if (status[0] & IEC958_AES0_NONAUDIO)
+ reg |= SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG_NONAUDIO;
- regmap_update_bits(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG,
- SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG_CHSTMODE |
- SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG_NONAUDIO, reg);
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
+ regmap_update_bits(host->regmap, SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG,
+ SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG_CHSTMODE |
+ SUN4I_SPDIF_TXCFG_NONAUDIO, reg);
+ }
return chg0 || chg1;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 9:53 [PATCH v2 0/3] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-spdif: Cleanup and runtime PM improvements phucduc.bui
2026-05-22 9:53 ` phucduc.bui [this message]
2026-05-22 9:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-spdif: Resume device before kcontrol register access phucduc.bui
2026-05-22 9:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-spdif: Reorder clock enable sequence phucduc.bui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522095401.72915-2-phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=codekipper@gmail.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nichen@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox