From: Manish Baing <manishbaing2789@gmail.com>
To: lee@kernel.org, ukleinek@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
linusw@kernel.org
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manishbaing2789@gmail.com,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: st,stmpe: Add missing properties for PWM subnode
Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 17:32:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260523173251.72540-2-manishbaing2789@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260523173251.72540-1-manishbaing2789@gmail.com>
The st,stmpe-pwm binding is already covered by the MFD schema in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/st,stmpe.yaml. However, the
PWM subnode was missing a 'required' properties block. This allowed
Device Tree nodes to pass validation even if the 'compatible'
string was omitted. This omission could lead to probe failures
at runtime.
Fix the schema by adding the missing 'required' block.
Signed-off-by: Manish Baing <manishbaing2789@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/st,stmpe.yaml | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/st,stmpe.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/st,stmpe.yaml
index df43878fbe18..4bb05d544901 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/st,stmpe.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/st,stmpe.yaml
@@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ properties:
"#pwm-cells":
const: 2
+ required:
+ - compatible
+ - "#pwm-cells"
+
touchscreen:
type: object
$ref: /schemas/input/touchscreen/touchscreen.yaml#
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-23 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-23 17:32 [PATCH v4 0/2] dt-bindings: mfd/pwm: Split st,stmpe cleanup into separate patches Manish Baing
2026-05-23 17:32 ` Manish Baing [this message]
2026-05-23 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: stmpe: drop legacy binding Manish Baing
2026-05-24 11:21 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260523173251.72540-2-manishbaing2789@gmail.com \
--to=manishbaing2789@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox