From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2550FCD5BD0 for ; Tue, 26 May 2026 09:15:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6E3Xn+0H1KV2KOlPaoQck3gAXVlQji3IkxvruzI4lDU=; b=0i9f1iQXvv2sgsdvY/VY9AvFg+ poi+DI9mcXIgxiY2j/SOBfCxU0ldoMTnZBqtSRoLAIm9uSvxjB5SzePiKuVdFUKSRNjf7n1UIBldn 02m22o+P44eScu5nzsaR/1smhZd0XX/6KvnTMZC3uZVILC5SYksDLl8AV/YolvoeNZMwt2sYXWJAG kLUizIebM7jfeIi5atDeap7J3D41vAP95MglQkrDsWRt044RKrF/w9RNHsDO8asV1W+hLyHS5UQL0 Skwf7dEsay8I8niky13sp/Spo5Fgf8C7vBtZlxygsdYe5AwP5O6fcCGTpC1sSK7JUhaPx9jFLk6os kYRgN4/A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wRnt7-00000001Trz-3LPq; Tue, 26 May 2026 09:15:49 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wRnt5-00000001TrX-0HEj for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 May 2026 09:15:48 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55C244013; Tue, 26 May 2026 09:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EC2C1F000E9; Tue, 26 May 2026 09:15:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779786946; bh=6E3Xn+0H1KV2KOlPaoQck3gAXVlQji3IkxvruzI4lDU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=RsnWb1K0ajUHP8IwU5f6eZwKWwbz6K7rzyl+65TYWoHyYnhZsW7GRlua5Hy+Rxt1g 282gOx6iSsQyMmxVUXAmlPLKq3Db7pVAJSWC7LZ8yUZDXnqTfiOh1SuF4dJEbTgKRB t/jlnuoXkz4Y7grj5n3hI4+Q5veW3udBqpwrfTESfe9Neric9tWe4nmS7rTpnFYuwj DyDiRUd0Wgd30akzJvi1OsK8DKPfIkV6YLwPyp7090SX6pq9KaW/Q/kgE+WiuMIy+c x32+zr8zha3TO8gklohdgHCkQFzo8xgGmzetgisL9CGGdcyQu78G8AV0xf4LI8/TB8 SZ8lQJY3p2oZw== Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 11:15:43 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Josua Mayer Cc: Shawn Guo , Li Yang , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Li , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Yazan Shhady , Jon Nettleton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add solidrun lx2160a twins board Message-ID: <20260526-offbeat-musical-frog-94fec7@quoll> References: <20260524-lx2160-pci-v7-0-09370c23b952@solid-run.com> <20260524-lx2160-pci-v7-5-09370c23b952@solid-run.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260524-lx2160-pci-v7-5-09370c23b952@solid-run.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260526_021547_125556_D3BE7BB0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.95 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, May 24, 2026 at 04:54:44PM +0200, Josua Mayer wrote: > The SolidRun LX2160A Twins board supports two configurations, one with > with a single CEX-7 module, and one with two (dual). > > The single configuration is a specific assembly that maximises > connectivity for single cpu by routing some second cpu resources to the > first via zero-Ohm resistors. > > The dual configuration was not yet tested and is intentionally omitted. > > Initial review strongly suggests that the dual configuration will have > different bindings, because from either cpu point of view the board > appears different (e.g. different number of sfp, fewer i2c gpio). > > Add binding for the single variant only. > > Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof