From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADD97CD5BDE for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 01:59:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=HrrofRYL2z0dvHXeTssozkcKWCmca/7LdFgTt3bUbuk=; b=CweuxjAlC2DOeHLVOkiQtOIYOf s0wMPDSSY+slilp6SVCstpDfRC3qj3ogYvIteM6qZ/Yje1MGYe+fgrq14rowbljcqmvYJZX5LITnn RH3ZYCb8G1ceGxZu8/QcLid0p5Fwx6uJL4L34UuMyQ8DuZS84QqnIIk5PLHZVsVWMiC8unPquKQtM U97O2o1ujWrywfbfICiBUPjLI1wPlRgd5xgZQ1F15Y5wGclvgjh5ld8KdzNHC0L/G66nf2O+54jXi RZWgClxf1m8kb6AnFB7Z6UPmflEaxTUaAa5X/na6kc69YXZjCDquLYL37UPk6CCGOt76mBHxYj5KJ 38A8DpFA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wS3YD-000000038pM-0Cu4; Wed, 27 May 2026 01:59:17 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wS3YB-000000038pG-40d4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 May 2026 01:59:16 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1497160098; Wed, 27 May 2026 01:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8273C1F000E9; Wed, 27 May 2026 01:59:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779847154; bh=HrrofRYL2z0dvHXeTssozkcKWCmca/7LdFgTt3bUbuk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=I44m3YabNCaRf9MGC3FNPgMBeFtRbN4RwifF5NdF7BB/kM6Wno628WXkP2BeocYmI cn+efU01XGmaac1UWKDib1aBDzh3ItfnN3arln/LccUjG6A/t5TSYPA+IwOuQ3Kq3I AQxR4OpCLVY3zdiA93tGhrXkhJ5Tt/vXsWw1mBUnX133HIyMDxl2XWYh4s3xTc4CRA Vl0nWMg3Y5dtUTxjLuXMtSjHqnSLAb2dJUIpqnW6ZQIh5CHN0DwNLnJ/P+nWgdYi/e fhRbEMjv17cRCIsAKyDzpwg5rRF8GxHTzfAffy/D0Pp0OjjaOEdfj3A+z+aI8Ly/RS aa39Pu+XClZKQ== Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 18:57:54 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Christoph Hellwig , Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] lib/raid6: Include asm/neon-intrinsics.h rather than arm_neon.h Message-ID: <20260527015754.GA13078@sol> References: <20260422171655.3437334-10-ardb+git@google.com> <20260422171655.3437334-17-ardb+git@google.com> <20260423074712.GC31018@lst.de> <20260509202354.GD11883@quark> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260509202354.GD11883@quark> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 01:23:54PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 09:47:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > From: Ard Biesheuvel > > > > > > arm_neon.h is a compiler header which needs some scaffolding to work > > > correctly in the linux context, and so it is better not to include it > > > directly. Both ARM and arm64 now provide asm/neon-intrinsics.h which > > > takes care of this. > > > > > > This could potentially clash with the raid6 library rework I'm doing > > for 7.2. Although git has become pretty good about renamed files, so > > maybe it won't be so bad. > > > > I think this patch also breaks the userspace build of lib/raid6/. Which > is going away in Christoph's series anyway, but maybe it would make > sense to drop this patch (and patch 8 which depends on this, I think) > from this series for now? That would make it a bit easier to take the > rest through crc-next. Ard, are you okay with me applying just patches 1-6 to crc-next? - Eric