From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
jens.wiklander@linaro.org, sumit.garg@kernel.org,
sebastianene@google.com, vdonnefort@google.com,
sudeep.holla@kernel.org, Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/6] arm_ffa, KVM: Fix FF-A emad offset calculations
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 15:02:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260527150236.1978655-1-smostafa@google.com> (raw)
Hi all,
This series fixes the Endpoint Memory Access Descriptor (EMAD) offset
calculations and adds the necessary bounds checks for both the core
FF-A driver and the pKVM hypervisor.
Prior to FF-A version 1.1, the memory region header didn't specify an
explicit offset for the EMADs, leading to the assumption that they
immediately follow the header.
However, from v1.1 onwards, the specification dictates using the
ep_mem_offset` field to determine the start of the memory access
array.
The patches in this series address this by:
1. Updating the core `arm_ffa` firmware driver to correctly calculate the descriptor
offset using `ep_mem_offset` rather than defaulting to `sizeof(struct ffa_mem_region)`.
It also introduces bounds checking against `max_fragsize`.
2. Enhancing the pKVM hypervisor validation logic to no longer strictly enforce that
the descriptor strictly follows the header, aligning it with the driver behavior
and the FF-A specification, while also ensuring the offset falls within the mailbox
buffer bounds.
While addressing these bugs, Sashiko uncovered other issues that were
fixed in the same series.
All the patches aside from the first one in optee are urgent fixes as
they either impact the hypervisor security or kernel stability.
Changelog
#########
v5->v6:
- Add fixes tag
- Small clean up make variable declaration reverse christmas tree.
v4->v5:
- Collect Sudeep Rbs
- Add extra patch to check base address alignment.
- Remove WARN_ONs in KVM code
- Use ffa_emad_size_get() instead of hardcoded size in KVM code.
v3 -> v4:
- Address review comments and fix Sashiko bugs
v2 -> v3:
- Fixed typo in nvhe/ffa.c (missing sizeof)
v1 -> v2:
- For pKVM, removed the strict placement enforcement for `ep_mem_offset` as it is not
compliant with the spec, and avoids making assumptions about the driver's memory
layout.
Link to:
########
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260526151934.3783707-1-smostafa@google.com/
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260520204948.2440882-1-smostafa@google.com/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260512124442.1899107-1-sebastianene@google.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260430160241.1934777-1-sebastianene@google.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ae9KN9nkOgDYJcGP@google.com/T/#t
Mostafa Saleh (4):
optee: ffa: Add NULL check in optee_ffa_lend_protmem
firmware: arm_ffa: Fix out-of-bound writes in ffa_setup_and_transmit()
KVM: arm64: Fix bounds checking in do_ffa_mem_reclaim()
KVM: arm64: Ensure FFA ranges are page aligned
Sebastian Ene (2):
firmware: arm_ffa: Fix Endpoint Memory Access Descriptor offset
calculation
KVM: arm64: Validate the offset to the mem access descriptor
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c | 21 ++++++++++-------
drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 3 +++
include/linux/arm_ffa.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
2.54.0.746.g67dd491aae-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-27 15:02 Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2026-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] optee: ffa: Add NULL check in optee_ffa_lend_protmem Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-27 18:55 ` Sumit Garg
2026-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] firmware: arm_ffa: Fix out-of-bound writes in ffa_setup_and_transmit() Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] firmware: arm_ffa: Fix Endpoint Memory Access Descriptor offset calculation Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] KVM: arm64: Fix bounds checking in do_ffa_mem_reclaim() Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] KVM: arm64: Validate the offset to the mem access descriptor Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] KVM: arm64: Ensure FFA ranges are page aligned Mostafa Saleh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260527150236.1978655-1-smostafa@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox