Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Łukasz Majewski" <lukasz.majewski@mailbox.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	nathan@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh@kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn  <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [net-next v24 3/7] net: mtip: Add buffers management functions to the L2 switch driver
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 10:37:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609103704.443c0b57@wsk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605021853.3594553-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Hi Jakub,

> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> ---
> net: mtip: Add buffers management functions to the L2 switch driver
> 
> This patch fills in mtip_alloc_buffers() and mtip_free_buffers() for
> the MTIP L2 switch driver, replacing the previously empty stubs with
> real page_pool setup/teardown and tx_bounce buffer allocation/free.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/mtipsw/mtipl2sw.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/mtipsw/mtipl2sw.c index
> > 1d1005a42306..5b5229ee411d 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/mtipsw/mtipl2sw.c +++
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/mtipsw/mtipl2sw.c @@ -892,11
> > +892,101 @@ static void mtip_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev, 
> >  static void mtip_free_buffers(struct net_device *dev)
> >  {
> > +	struct mtip_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +	struct switch_enet_private *fep = priv->fep;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
> > +		if (!fep->page[i])
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		page_pool_put_full_page(fep->page_pool,
> > +					fep->page[i], false);
> > +		fep->page[i] = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	page_pool_destroy(fep->page_pool);
> > +	fep->page_pool = NULL;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < TX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
> > +		kfree(fep->tx_bounce[i]);
> > +		fep->tx_bounce[i] = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +}  
> 
> [High]
> Now that mtip_free_buffers() is no longer an empty stub, can the
> mtip_open() error path tear down buffers that another active port is
> still using?
> 
> Looking at mtip_open():
> 
> 	if (fep->usage_count == 0) {
> 		...
> 		ret = mtip_alloc_buffers(dev);
> 		if (ret)
> 			goto mtip_alloc_buffers_err;
> 	}
> 	...
> 	ret = mtip_mii_probe(dev);
> 	if (ret)
> 		goto mtip_mii_probe_err;
> 	...
>  mtip_mii_probe_err:
> 	mtip_free_buffers(dev);
>  mtip_alloc_buffers_err:
> 	if (fep->usage_count == 0) {
> 		netif_napi_del(&fep->napi);
> 		clk_disable(fep->clk_ipg);
> 	}
> 	return ret;
> 
> mtip_alloc_buffers() only runs when fep->usage_count == 0, so the
> page_pool, fep->page[] and fep->tx_bounce[] are shared across switch
> ports and only allocated on first open. mtip_close() reflects this and
> only calls mtip_free_buffers() when fep->usage_count == 1.
> 
> When a second port is opened (fep->usage_count > 0) and
> mtip_mii_probe() fails, the mtip_mii_probe_err label still calls
> mtip_free_buffers() unconditionally, which destroys the page_pool and
> frees the tx_bounce buffers that the first, still-active port is
> using.
> 
> Should the mtip_mii_probe_err teardown also be guarded by
> fep->usage_count == 0 (or the labels reordered) so buffers are only
> freed for the last user, similar to mtip_close()?
> 
> After this change the previously harmless call becomes a real
> teardown, so the surviving port's NAPI path (mtip_switch_rx() and the
> later mtip_update_cbd() refill) would dereference a freed
> fep->page_pool and NULL fep->page[] / fep->tx_bounce[] entries
> whenever the second port's PHY probe fails while the first port is up.
> 
> >  
> > +static int mtip_create_page_pool(struct switch_enet_private *fep,
> > int size) +{  
> [ ... ]
> > +}
> >  
> >  static int mtip_alloc_buffers(struct net_device *dev)
> >  {  
> [ ... ]
> >  	return 0;
> > +
> > + err:
> > +	mtip_free_buffers(dev);
> > +	return -ENOMEM;
> >  }
> >  

Thank you for sending the AI review.

Please find my comments:

- I've gone through them and yes, there are a few issues found.
  However, those are IMHO not critical ones.

- Some issues are not valid at all - like concern what happens when the
  switch is run on multi processor chip - both imx287 and vf610 are
  single core chips.

- It seems like the AI review is "progressing" - i.e. there were no
  issues found with v23 for this particular patch. I do guess that the
  new Orc Mode from [1] has found it.

- I do guess that different AI agent would generate different review

- The aforementioned issues could be addressed with a fix patches -
  dragging along (and preparing for upstream) patch set with ~3400
  LOC (which is rejected by non-deterministic AI review) takes too much
  resources now.


To sum up:
----------

The MTIP driver for v6.6 kernel (YPRR Scarthgap) with and without
PREEMPT_RT for vf610 and imx287 as well as the v24 for net-next can be
found at [2].


Links:

[1] - https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
[2] - https://github.com/lmajewski/linux-imx28-l2switch/branches



-- 
Best regards,

Łukasz Majewski


      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260601112437.2216043-4-lukasz.majewski@mailbox.org>
2026-06-05  2:18 ` [net-next v24 3/7] net: mtip: Add buffers management functions to the L2 switch driver Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09  8:37   ` Łukasz Majewski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609103704.443c0b57@wsk \
    --to=lukasz.majewski@mailbox.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox