From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FDBECD8CB2 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:05:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=P7CRDgQRCgbswaPyjvGXosFvqSn1cQaZz3l28dfD8pA=; b=kYNl5ELIlJmHOevIKN/QGOWjwf ZHAWwOTChNkAkevSm8PvW8EMnn6QxkrKM6sDZhjLSUIJ09YNXaWW4La4s2wyAi5lascMXWO9Ask2G lFWi4d/USLbcdRSyLuMgjbUZ+9yLKMui9IsvFPH9MmSwsLvtla1agoQWWc2gznQiZjF3c5HWvR3MN Gz4MWWjLOeYbGNFsxF0fZkM79V7CpBGF45yZ5WRANx9PUTNCfCJlsggLiYosSVfP4f+2jUTDHa6cv Jb5bS/yfBBXutTf/KCI+uY7w29iTjyDS8TuXcxX8iaX6s9KtCFicR5Ge4ZBzl5dEQAIxpYaHkNZxb TMX59RrA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wXDVk-00000006xtc-1BrB; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:38:04 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wXDVi-00000006xtW-31nL for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:38:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253C343848; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F07E1F00898; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:38:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781077082; bh=P7CRDgQRCgbswaPyjvGXosFvqSn1cQaZz3l28dfD8pA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=aLfu2WYV9r7arf9MLaBIu2ytvYUSx9dTUD0tgLBGlvbQFBSLSkMkr+9GF41qVul09 7s2nk+Kiaf8Dm8YOGAWSOw2ttxjDChRHf1DtTPjZZPvVUOrLWseonB8S96DH+Et7Dj 3b2P9FZcn5p+YBliCxcwujDZ+zFO0UNigzY62VglAYWOkWZfzoo1jqJd4QNrhL7Kyh c8RnsDAtYB1xfIjKdo+s56AqsgXJVwWgcOcnQo2DAHdGCAQjlg0HXlbISMWaD6CfDZ sVfadXSbyBBUXt34cnjfIJYaAfK99SlRv863wfBOHvYbCURqP3vNFhpBuPRWpo45u+ iTz3pxu3dkziw== Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:37:58 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Laurentiu Mihalcea Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Sascha Hauer , Peng Fan , Fabio Estevam , Daniel Baluta , Francesco Dolcini , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: document optional "memory-region-names" Message-ID: <20260610-adventurous-granite-marmoset-e0eaa8@quoll> References: <20260605113621.1479-1-laurentiumihalcea111@gmail.com> <20260605113621.1479-2-laurentiumihalcea111@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260605113621.1479-2-laurentiumihalcea111@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 04:36:18AM -0700, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote: > From: Laurentiu Mihalcea > > The names of the carveout regions are derived using the names of the > reserved memory devicetree nodes, which are referenced using the > "memory-region" property. This adds a restriction on the names of said > devicetree nodes, often bearing specific names such as: "vdevbuffer", > "vdev0vring0", "rsc-table", etc... This goes against the devicetree > specification's recommendation, which states that the devicetree node > names should be generic. No, it does not. Names like rsc-table feels exactly like DT spec is asking - for a name matching purpose. Are you sure you read the spec? > > Fix this by documenting an additional, optional property: > "memory-region-names". This way, the carveout names can use the values > passed via "memory-region-names", while keeping the devicetree node > names of the reserved memory regions generic. I don't see how anything here is fixed. memory-region-names has nothing to do with node names. Best regards, Krzysztof