From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Jaeyoung Chung <jjy600901@snu.ac.kr>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sangyun Kim <sangyun.kim@snu.ac.kr>,
Kyungwook Boo <bookyungwook@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: spi: uniphier: KASAN wild-memory-access in complete() on early IRQ
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 22:57:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610225705.37b09a7f876e5ba07757377a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610115622.773149-1-jjy600901@snu.ac.kr>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:56:21 +0900
Jaeyoung Chung <jjy600901@snu.ac.kr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> uniphier_spi_probe() in drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c registers the
> interrupt handler uniphier_spi_handler() with devm_request_irq() before
> it initializes priv->xfer_done with init_completion(). If an interrupt
> arrives after devm_request_irq() and before init_completion(), the
> handler calls complete() on an uninitialized completion, causing a
> kernel panic.
>
> The probe path, in uniphier_spi_probe():
>
> host = spi_alloc_host(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv)); /* priv kzalloc-zeroed */
> ...
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, uniphier_spi_handler,
> 0, "uniphier-spi", priv); /* register handler */
> ...
> init_completion(&priv->xfer_done); /* initialize completion */
>
> The interrupt handler uniphier_spi_handler() calls complete() on its
> done path:
>
> done:
> complete(&priv->xfer_done);
>
> If the device raises an interrupt before init_completion() runs,
> complete() acquires the uninitialized wait.lock and walks the zeroed
> task_list in swake_up_locked(). The zeroed task_list makes list_empty()
> return false, so swake_up_locked() dereferences a NULL list entry,
> triggering a KASAN wild-memory-access.
>
> Suggested fix: move init_completion(&priv->xfer_done) above
> devm_request_irq(), so the completion is valid before the handler can run.
>
> Reported-by: Sangyun Kim <sangyun.kim@snu.ac.kr>
> Reported-by: Kyungwook Boo <bookyungwook@gmail.com>
>
Good catch! All resources used by a callback, should be initialized before
registering it.
Kinihiko, can you fix it by reordering the initialization?
Thank you,
> Thanks,
> Jaeyoung Chung
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 11:56 spi: uniphier: KASAN wild-memory-access in complete() on early IRQ Jaeyoung Chung
2026-06-10 13:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-06-11 5:32 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610225705.37b09a7f876e5ba07757377a@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=bookyungwook@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
--cc=jjy600901@snu.ac.kr \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sangyun.kim@snu.ac.kr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox