From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Jaeyoung Chung <jjy600901@snu.ac.kr>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Vladimir Zapolskiy" <vz@mleia.com>,
"Piotr Wojtaszczyk" <piotr.wojtaszczyk@timesys.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Sangyun Kim" <sangyun.kim@snu.ac.kr>,
"Kyungwook Boo" <bookyungwook@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: iio: adc: KASAN wild-memory-access in complete() on early IRQ
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:22:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611172252.02256652@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610115700.774689-1-jjy600901@snu.ac.kr>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:57:00 +0900
Jaeyoung Chung <jjy600901@snu.ac.kr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> lpc32xx_adc_probe() in drivers/iio/adc/lpc32xx_adc.c and
> spear_adc_probe() in drivers/iio/adc/spear_adc.c register their
> interrupt handler with devm_request_irq() before they initialize
> st->completion with init_completion(). If an interrupt arrives after
> devm_request_irq() and before init_completion(), the handler calls
> complete() on an uninitialized completion, causing a kernel panic.
>
> The probe path, in lpc32xx_adc_probe():
>
> iodev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*st)); /* st kzalloc-zeroed */
> ...
> retval = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, lpc32xx_adc_isr, 0,
> LPC32XXAD_NAME, st); /* register handler */
> ...
> init_completion(&st->completion); /* initialize completion */
>
> spear_adc_probe() has the same ordering: devm_request_irq() for
> spear_adc_isr() before init_completion(&st->completion).
>
> Both interrupt handlers, lpc32xx_adc_isr() and spear_adc_isr(), call
> complete():
>
> complete(&st->completion);
>
> If the device raises an interrupt before init_completion() runs,
> complete() acquires the uninitialized wait.lock and walks the zeroed
> task_list in swake_up_locked(). The zeroed task_list makes list_empty()
> return false, so swake_up_locked() dereferences a NULL list entry,
> triggering a KASAN wild-memory-access.
>
> Suggested fix: move init_completion(&st->completion) above
> devm_request_irq(), so the completion is valid before the handler can run.
>
> Reported-by: Sangyun Kim <sangyun.kim@snu.ac.kr>
> Reported-by: Kyungwook Boo <bookyungwook@gmail.com>
Hi I think the report is valid, but I'm curious to whether you ran these
drivers given the hardware is pretty obscure! If not how did KASAN detect
anything (unless there is a static analysis version I'm not aware of)
Given age of drivers and that this only occurs if a spurious IRQ turns
up I'm not going to rush to fix this. However, I'd certainly welcome
patches.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Thanks,
> Jaeyoung Chung
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 11:57 iio: adc: KASAN wild-memory-access in complete() on early IRQ Jaeyoung Chung
2026-06-11 16:07 ` Maxwell Doose
2026-06-11 17:50 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-06-11 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611172252.02256652@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bookyungwook@gmail.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jjy600901@snu.ac.kr \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=piotr.wojtaszczyk@timesys.com \
--cc=sangyun.kim@snu.ac.kr \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox