From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Nipun Gupta" <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
"Nikhil Agarwal" <nikhil.agarwal@amd.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@kernel.org>,
"Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Oleksandr Tyshchenko" <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Charan Teja Kalla" <charan.kalla@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 0/3] of: parsing of multi #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:35:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612153559.GA1082302-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603-parse_iommu_cells-v16-0-dc509dacb19a@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 12:43:11PM +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> So far our parsing of {iommu,msi}-map properties has always blindly
> assumed that the output specifiers will always have exactly 1 cell.
> This typically does happen to be the case, but is not actually enforced
> (and the PCI msi-map binding even explicitly states support for 0 or 1
> cells) - as a result we've now ended up with dodgy DTs out in the field
> which depend on this behaviour to map a 1-cell specifier for a 2-cell
> provider, despite that being bogus per the bindings themselves.
>
> Since there is some potential use[1] in being able to map at least
> single input IDs to multi-cell output specifiers (and properly support
> 0-cell outputs as well), add support for properly parsing and using the
> target nodes' #cells values, albeit with the unfortunate complication of
> still having to work around expectations of the old behaviour too.
> -- Robin.
>
> Unlike single #{}-cell, it is complex to establish a linear relation
> between input 'id' and output specifier for multi-cell properties, thus
> it is always expected that len never going to be > 1.
>
> These changes have been tested on QEMU for the arm64 architecture and
> on the glymur platform [3].
>
> Since, this would also need update in dt-schema, raised PR[2] for the
> same.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250627-video_cb-v3-0-51e18c0ffbce@quicinc.com/
> [2] PR for iommu-map dtschema: https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/184
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260515-glymur-v6-5-f6a99cb43a24@oss.qualcomm.com/
>
> V16:
> - Patch 2: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in of_msi_xlate()
> when msi_np is NULL. Guard the of_check_msi_parent() call with
> "if (msi_np && ...)" to handle the case where the caller passes
> NULL for msi_np, as documented. Reported by Sashiko [1].
> - Patch 2: Fix OF node refcount leak in of_msi_map_get_device_domain():
> np was never released after of_msi_xlate() transferred ownership.
> - Patch 3: Default to 1-cell output specifier when the target node
> lacks the #iommu-cells/#msi-cells property, for backward
> compatibility with controllers that predate the property
> (e.g. arm,gic-v2m-frame). Reported by Sashiko [1].
> - Patch 3: Add !cells_name to the initial parameter guard in
> of_map_id() to prevent a crash if cells_name is NULL.
> Reported by Sashiko [1].
I've applied the series, thanks.
Rob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 7:13 [PATCH v16 0/3] of: parsing of multi #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps Vijayanand Jitta
2026-06-03 7:13 ` [PATCH v16 1/3] of: Add convenience wrappers for of_map_id() Vijayanand Jitta
2026-06-03 7:13 ` [PATCH v16 2/3] of: Factor arguments passed to of_map_id() into a struct Vijayanand Jitta
2026-06-03 7:13 ` [PATCH v16 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps Vijayanand Jitta
2026-06-12 15:35 ` Rob Herring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612153559.GA1082302-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=charan.kalla@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nikhil.agarwal@amd.com \
--cc=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox