From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DC31CD98C7 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:11:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=DCdzVaLtfObb9ZWcY0NE9dFqLduRZkfGF/mOGT7kBic=; b=VYGZRJRQCxIaBeGY1hGHck9fyg HUQCIE45vyIXXlIeFOSexUJoXwQS6XgUmCc7tn8g3CISPAKKMlWrpPOrYQbrFNfGifTrUnNNs6OkP xGJe6fKtGLlKXCY9WRkwOk2axhZowrqWTM1v8XF5md3y9IoJvKRfyexlSIUob9/pBnhBp/BV6YLkw rd+PJJL0L85Wot9V6iECePIPJ7XD63qAR00Z4sEZqQeQrA1Cx0EJ+7+L5q4UVK3U8lGHzkoMB81OH 5AH05b+eXtJudaicAC6cubK/LUziQOfTkc+n7J4TDZC/Ix3+GNbgLXG4rIGwQ19kd+g6lvMZFjNX+ I2o8WuSw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wYoN4-0000000DCro-0NnG; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:11:42 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wYoN2-0000000DCrd-1nVB; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:11:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A49D42ABB; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67D801F000E9; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:11:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781457099; bh=DCdzVaLtfObb9ZWcY0NE9dFqLduRZkfGF/mOGT7kBic=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=WJENZEyZBWe3+949+6oiVJgtitZd3LYuAyoJFHmYSKCxnRwM/AMDYzq1nYrKbNSIT LunA/Hb6tG5KJz1R4yC2F8D7z8/kBN0R5UlCPbDnS28MUXoWrwCyMAJX7KHOgRlILA ePSPKMM4r1FP+kZiCA2L/17m1RX7huz+ImquUWSJRPNmbqVaBnn/bWk5SZV+wgcGOU jr8LI5sF6WWXV/8FsEPx+u+f+H8hqc6xmTB5PrjISjG/YwZcLh/KMVZNOiVl51kLKI aA/lN4/X21MWjDIuCjIana8E+k8ktTpCxbEPiiEdtDCc2HA0WX96IsfM2IkpbtuWyg 0BZSzL2SUMt1A== Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 18:11:28 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Roman Vivchar , David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Lee Jones , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Ben Grisdale Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] iio: adc: mt6323-auxadc: add mt6323 PMIC AUXADC driver Message-ID: <20260614181128.4c1b762a@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20260609-mt6323-adc-v2-0-aa93a22309f9@protonmail.com> <20260609-mt6323-adc-v2-2-aa93a22309f9@protonmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:33:12 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 07:15:42PM +0000, Roman Vivchar wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 9th, 2026 at 9:30 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 04:31:59PM +0300, Roman Vivchar via B4 Relay wrote: > > ... > > > > > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: > > > > + scoped_guard(mutex, &auxadc->lock) { > > > > > > I'm wondering why we haven't moved to guard()() here > > > > The compiler would complain about 'cannot jump from switch statement' > > due to default case. See the brackets Andy suggested. That error is what you get without specifically defining the scope. > > I am not sure I follow. See the examples in the existing drivers. They are > warning clean in that sense. >