From: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org
Cc: joey.gouly@arm.com, korneld@google.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, android-kvm@google.com,
mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com, perlarsen@google.com,
sebastianene@google.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
vdonnefort@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/7] KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION* calls to TrustZone
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:41:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616154149.2763214-1-sebastianene@google.com> (raw)
Remove the FFA_NOTIFICATION* calls from the blocklist used by the pKVM
FF-A proxy. This restriction was preventing the use of asynchronous
signaling mechanisms defined by the Arm FF-A specification to
communicate with the secure services.
While these calls are markes as optional, there is no reason why the
hypervisor proxy would block them because:
1. Host is the Sole Non-Secure Endpoint: The Host operates as the
only Non-Secure VM ID (VM ID 0) recognized by the Secure World.
Because all forwarded notifications are inherently attributed to
the Host by the SPMC, there is no risk of VM ID spoofing
originating from the Normal World.
2. No Memory Pointers or Addresses: The FFA_NOTIFICATION_* ABIs
operate strictly via register-based parameters, passing only
VM IDs, VCPU IDs, flags, and bitmaps. Because these calls do
not contain memory addresses, offsets, or pointers, forwarding
them doesn't pose a risk of memory-based confused deputy attack
(e.g., tricking the SPMC into overwriting protected memory).
While the pKVM proxy behaves as a relayer, it doesn't currently have its
own FF-A ID(only the host has the ID 0). The behavior of the setup
flow is covered by the spec in the: '10.9 Notification support without
a Hypervisor'.
---
Changes in v4:
- previous series(v3) had serious issues with the patch number and it
appeared like it used a mixed bag from v2 as well. Resend this to
restore the correct order of the patches.
- fix strict check in ffa_check_unused_args_sbz and make it "<= 17"
- check the receiver endpoint Id in
FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND/FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND instead of the sender
- use hyp_smccc_1_2_smc all along
- check the receiver endpoit Id when doing FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET
Changes in v3:
- applied Will's suggestion to use the introduced method
ffa_check_unused_args_sbz for existing calls and added a new
patch in the beggining of the series to do this.
- merged the handling of
FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP_CREATE/FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP_DESTROY into
one patch as Vincent suggested and create one handler for both.
Changes in v2:
- enforce the MBZ/SBZ fields
- split the calls into separate patches
- rebase on 7.1-rc7
Link to v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616105417.2578670-1-sebastianene@google.com/
Link to v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260608165549.1479409-1-sebastianene@google.com/
Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260501114447.2389222-2-sebastianene@google.com/
Sebastian Ene (7):
KVM: arm64: Enforce strict SBZ checks in the FF-A proxy
KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP calls to Trustzone
KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND in host handler
KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND in host handler
KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET in host handler
KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET in host handler
KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET in host handler
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 203 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.54.0.1136.gdb2ca164c4-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 15:41 Sebastian Ene [this message]
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] KVM: arm64: Enforce strict SBZ checks in the FF-A proxy Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP calls to Trustzone Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND in host handler Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET " Sebastian Ene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616154149.2763214-1-sebastianene@google.com \
--to=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=android-kvm@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=korneld@google.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=perlarsen@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox