Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>,
	clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, linusw@kernel.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	liaohua4@huawei.com, lilinjie8@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: enable interrupts when arm_notify_die() is handling user mode errors
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:30:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625093008.e5I4bh-_@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajzvcCve4LubjH9J@shell.armlinux.org.uk>

On 2026-06-25 10:05:52 [+0100], Russell King wrote:
> > for this but actual breakpoint handling might be broken or is it just
> > me? But then your stack trace looks like mine so :/
> 
> ARM Linux doesn't use BKPT. BKPT was an instruction introduced by Arm
> Ltd in ARMv5TE. Prior to this, we use a UDF instruction instead (we
> had to pick something!) and gdb and other tools use that as a
> breapoint.
> 
> Moreover, BKPT isn't guaranteed to trap to the kernel, especially when
> there is a hardware debugger connected. In that case, DDI0100E states
> that use of BKPT must be according to the instructions provided with
> the hardware debugger. This makes BKPT unsuitable for use.

So you are saying this:

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
index e62cc4be5adf6..11ac69113eca2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
@@ -595,6 +595,16 @@ do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int do_debug_event(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
+			  struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	if (!user_mode(regs))
+		return 1;
+	local_irq_enable();
+	ptrace_break(regs);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 struct fsr_info {
 	int	(*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs);
 	int	sig;
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fsr-2level.c b/arch/arm/mm/fsr-2level.c
index f2be95197265d..bfd718f64020c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fsr-2level.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fsr-2level.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static struct fsr_info fsr_info[] = {
 static struct fsr_info ifsr_info[] = {
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 0"			   },
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 1"			   },
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"debug event"			   },
+	{ do_debug_event,	SIGBUS,  0,		"debug event"			   },
 	{ do_bad,		SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"section access flag fault"	   },
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 4"			   },
 	{ do_translation_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR,	"section translation fault"	   },
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fsr-3level.c b/arch/arm/mm/fsr-3level.c
index d0ae2963656a6..96c1d45d20d9e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fsr-3level.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fsr-3level.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static struct fsr_info fsr_info[] = {
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error (translation table walk" },
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 32"			},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  BUS_ADRALN,	"alignment fault"		},
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"debug event"			},
+	{ do_debug_event,	SIGBUS,  0,		"debug event"			},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 35"			},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 36"			},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 37"			},

is not worth doing it? With this I can my little testcase working.

> Consequently, ARM Linux has not supported the use of BKPT - no code
> was added to support this instruction, hence why the kernel prints an
> Alert level message stating that the fault was unhandled.
> 
> In addition, when a hardware debugger is not being used, with the
> addition of hw_breakpoint.c, what userland sees in response depends on
> kernel configuration. If hw_breakpoint.c is not built (when PERF_EVENTS
> is disabled), then a SIGBUS signal will be raised. If it is built, and
> prior to a recent commit by LinusW, it will raise a SIGTRAP. After
> LinusW's commit, it won't raise a signal, but userspace will spin on
> the BKPT instruction.
> 
> The path we go through in the above case is very much an "oh damn,
> we aren't handling this exception, let's try to do something that
> might save the day".

Okay.

> Rather than throwing local_irq_enable() in random places, it would
> be better to do it earlier, but I would want to review what x86 does
> when it gets an exception that the kernel doesn't handle - not sure
> when I'll get around to doing that though.

That would be exc_int3() from arch/x86/kernel/traps.c.
Besides doing "notify_die(DIE_INT3, "int3", regs, 0, X86_TRAP_BP, SIGTRAP);"

it does cond_local_irq_enable() which enables the interrupts if they
were enabled by the "caller", sends the signal (SIGTRAP).

Sebastian


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-25  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-25  7:35 [PATCH] ARM: enable interrupts when arm_notify_die() is handling user mode errors Xie Yuanbin
2026-06-25  8:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-25  9:05   ` Russell King
2026-06-25  9:30     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-06-25 10:20       ` Russell King
2026-06-25 12:08         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-25 10:00 ` Xie Yuanbin
2026-06-25 10:23   ` Russell King
2026-06-25 12:26     ` Xie Yuanbin
2026-06-25 15:21       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260625093008.e5I4bh-_@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=liaohua4@huawei.com \
    --cc=lilinjie8@huawei.com \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=xieyuanbin1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox