From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tracing: Remove trace_printk.h from kernel.h
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:03:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626190325.GA3913132@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626045119.659d1e6b@fedora>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 04:51:19AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:41:58 -0700
> Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>
> > The following diff resolves it for me, should I send it as a separate
> > patch or do you want to just fold it in with a note?
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> > index 621566345406..2301a701ffbb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > #ifndef __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
> > #define __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
> >
> > +#include <linux/instruction_pointer.h>
>
> Ah, so the reason for this breakage is because lockdep was relying on
> instruction_pointer.h, that just happened to be included in kernel.h
> via trace_printk.h.
Correct.
> This is a separate issue, so it should be a separate patch. I'll add it
> as patch 1 of this series.
Sounds good, thanks!
> Can you send me the config you used. This didn't trigger in my tests.
It is a plain allmodconfig, for example on arm:
$ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- allmodconfig lib/test_context-analysis.o
In file included from include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:8,
from include/linux/local_lock.h:5,
from lib/test_context-analysis.c:9:
include/linux/local_lock_internal.h: In function 'local_lock_acquire':
include/linux/lockdep.h:541:87: error: '_THIS_IP_' undeclared (first use in this function)
541 | #define lock_map_acquire(l) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, 0, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
| ^~~~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:509:88: note: in definition of macro 'lock_acquire_exclusive'
509 | #define lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, n, i)
| ^
include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:46:9: note: in expansion of macro 'lock_map_acquire'
46 | lock_map_acquire(&l->dep_map);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:541:87: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
...
I also reproduced it on top of allnoconfig:
$ cat allno.config
CONFIG_CONTEXT_ANALYSIS_TEST=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
CONFIG_EXPERT=y
CONFIG_MMU=y
CONFIG_RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU=y
$ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=1 clean allnoconfig lib/test_context-analysis.o
<same error as above>
--
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 10:40 [PATCH v4 0/2] tracing: Move non-trace_printk prototypes into trace_controls.h Steven Rostedt
2026-06-25 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Steven Rostedt
2026-06-25 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] tracing: Remove trace_printk.h from kernel.h Steven Rostedt
2026-06-25 23:41 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-06-26 8:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-06-26 19:03 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] tracing: Move non-trace_printk prototypes into trace_controls.h Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260626190325.GA3913132@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox