From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC51C43458 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:01:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=d+GmTPQ2e6Fd3lhsWPVjYHOk225B7AvxIuodTHF3pEk=; b=dtlzrkLptLMk5Ce2AzDIKhLG2S 4nFwSzHz/AR5wiFZbcM6cK8FA4bqkgm3zDs+zNHVUFdggF/yhmaBm+lWaBbNFiD03p7Swl0RTZmx4 tIGpu/Z/KmzPTwfIuZB082tIL20EmU4cVylsK9liuIOvTXM1mtEiAEbLbAWJXLbmzPdQ5z6VkR0go sw9f+qOpdT8Jo7uX+FnnYvZ/aT0/KF27OwmBSt0YPuovwSLFr8APIdYAJHbuAoQ8LEMc7/4uUQ4BR hwcYFTx1nX+Kvc9snvBKEtCa48e+M/UJ1JZm8O1Eq+kh79kCdMbewiHfDyA6Ks/hjVX4nuTVDds+A a/FIEeRg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1weVHM-0000000GZ4M-0uoZ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:01:20 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1weVHI-0000000GZ36-35x8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:01:17 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A869E2C3E; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 03:01:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.2.196.114]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1FAD3FAFB; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 03:01:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1782813675; bh=d+GmTPQ2e6Fd3lhsWPVjYHOk225B7AvxIuodTHF3pEk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ePlEpp/ULFoRCNkiXLe2wgnWbHFer5U8AJmk00fBT4PXXP0q+BP+U+4PY15JneRyI 3d3AYNqFPfX0TLynt4odTD1u1/fryDKGBinH0RTeXIiGcxuc313GYgt3NtZh0qIJ0+ 929rvDLrRgTlpGVzgVXOidm/HhSYmXtvtPsZemgs= Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:01:12 +0100 From: Leo Yan To: Jie Gan Cc: Suzuki K Poulose , Mike Leach , James Clark , Konrad Dybcio , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Tingwei Zhang , Jingyi Wang , Abel Vesa , Yuanfang Zhang , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: fix traceNoC probe issue Message-ID: <20260630100112.GF1812158@e132581.arm.com> References: <20260625085643.GD575984@e132581.arm.com> <065853f5-b11b-4316-814e-202f07acb6ea@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260626103015.GE575984@e132581.arm.com> <20260626154949.GA1812158@e132581.arm.com> <9432df20-08bf-4134-b4b9-e6b5d618af81@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260629142848.GB1812158@e132581.arm.com> <20260630081021.GD1812158@e132581.arm.com> <37017aa2-e18c-4568-a37c-d13964cbb418@oss.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37017aa2-e18c-4568-a37c-d13964cbb418@oss.qualcomm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260630_030116_905392_D9B812B8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.81 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 04:42:39PM +0800, Jie Gan wrote: [...] > As Suzuki mentioned in the other thread, I think it would be better to add > separate compatibles in the of_match_table to distinguish between Aggregator > TraceNoC and Interconnect TraceNoC when probing with the platform driver. > This would allow us to allocate an ATID only for Aggregator TraceNoC during > probe, which is consistent with our original design. Makes sense for me!