Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, Kyle McMartin <jkkm@meta.com>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Shrink command/event/PRI queues in kdump kernel
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 21:16:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702001603.GN7525@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701154528.768976-1-kas@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 04:45:28PM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) wrote:
> The command, event and PRI queues are sized from the maxima the hardware
> advertises in IDR1, which can be several megabytes each. On systems with
> many SMMUv3 instances that cost is paid per instance and adds up to tens
> of megabytes of coherent DMA in the capture kernel.
> 
> A kdump capture kernel runs from a small crashkernel reservation and only
> has to drive the few devices used to save the dump, so deep queues serve
> no purpose. The queues carry invalidation commands and fault records, not
> DMA data, so dump throughput is unaffected; a shallower queue only bounds
> how many commands may be in flight before a sync, which does not matter for
> the capture kernel's small device count and modest I/O.
> 
> Clamp every queue to a single page when is_kdump_kernel() is true. Doing
> it in arm_smmu_init_one_queue() covers the command, event and PRI queues
> in one place. The command queue still holds at least one batch plus a sync
> (256 entries on a 4K-page kernel, well above CMDQ_BATCH_ENTRIES), so
> command batching keeps working.
> 
> Suggested-by: Kyle McMartin <jkkm@meta.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

Make sense to me

> +	if (is_kdump_kernel()) {
> +		u32 ent_sz_shift = ilog2(dwords) + 3;
> +
> +		q->llq.max_n_shift = min_t(u32, q->llq.max_n_shift,
> +					   PAGE_SHIFT - ent_sz_shift);

I saw lately many people saying you should not use min_t, why is it
needed here?

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-02  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 15:45 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Shrink command/event/PRI queues in kdump kernel Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-07-02  0:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-07-02  8:24   ` Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260702001603.GN7525@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jkkm@meta.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox