[PATCH v13 15/15] barrier: add clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()

[Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>]

Add a few clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(). These
ensure that the implementation doesn't do anything funny stuff with the
clock (like multiple accesses per iteration.)

Also ensure that we handle edge cases sanely. Note that two edge cases
fail: S64_MAX and U64_MAX. However, both of those are quite far out
and if needed, can be addressed in the implementation of the interface.

Also, this tests only smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(). The acquire
variant uses an identical clock path and testing wouldn't add anything.

Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
---
Notes: removed the test case for timeout=-1 (a negative timeout value is not
supported). This also addresses the comment about the test for timeout=-1
only being incidentally correct [1].

Also add test cases for timeout=0, timeout=1.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260608083449.171881F00898@smtp.kernel.org/
---
 lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c b/lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c
index 4226fb6456b3..ec78f8533006 100644
--- a/lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c
+++ b/lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ MODULE_IMPORT_NS("EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING");
 struct clock_state {
 	s64	start_time;
 	s64	end_time;
+	s64	extra;
+	u32	niters;
 };
 
 #define TIMEOUT_MSEC	2
@@ -112,8 +114,64 @@ static void test_smp_cond_timeout(struct kunit *test)
 		KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, runtime, timeout_ns);
 }
 
+static s64 synthetic_clock(struct clock_state *clk)
+{
+	clk->end_time += clk->extra;
+	clk->niters++;
+
+	return clk->end_time;
+}
+
+
+struct smp_cond_expiry_params {
+	char	*desc;
+	s64	timeout;
+	s64	clk_inc;
+	u32	niters;
+};
+
+static const struct smp_cond_expiry_params expiry_params_list[] = {
+	{ .clk_inc = (0x1ULL << 28), .timeout = 0,		.niters = 1,			.desc = "0",    },
+	{ .clk_inc = (0x1ULL << 28), .timeout = 1,		.niters = 2,			.desc = "1",    },
+	{ .clk_inc = (0x1ULL << 28), .timeout = (0x1ULL << 30), .niters = 1 + (1 << (30-28)),	.desc = "1<<30",   },
+	{ .clk_inc = (0x1ULL << 28), .timeout = S32_MAX,	.niters = 1 + (1 << (31-28)),	.desc = "S32_MAX", },
+	{ .clk_inc = (0x1ULL << 28), .timeout = U32_MAX,	.niters = 1 + (1 << (32-28)),	.desc = "U32_MAX", },
+	{ .clk_inc = (0x1ULL << 28), .timeout = (0x1ULL << 33), .niters = 1 + (1 << (33-28)),	.desc = "1<<33",   },
+};
+
+static void expiry_param_to_desc(const struct smp_cond_expiry_params *p, char *desc)
+{
+	snprintf(desc, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE, "smp_cond_%s_timeout: clock-%s, timeout=%s, iterations=%u",
+		"relaxed", "synthetic", p->desc, p->niters);
+}
+
+static void test_smp_cond_expiry(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct smp_cond_expiry_params *p = test->param_value;
+	struct clock_state clk = {
+		.start_time = 0,
+		.end_time = 0,
+		.extra = p->clk_inc,
+		.niters = 0,
+	};
+	s64 runtime;
+
+	flag = 0;
+	smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(&flag,
+				      0,
+				      synthetic_clock(&clk),
+				      p->timeout);
+
+	runtime = (u64)clk.end_time - (u64)clk.start_time;
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clk.niters, p->niters);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, runtime, p->timeout);
+}
+
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(smp_cond_expiry_params, expiry_params_list, expiry_param_to_desc);
 static struct kunit_case barrier_timeout_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_smp_cond_timeout, smp_cond_update_params_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_smp_cond_expiry, smp_cond_expiry_params_gen_params),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.43.7