Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, jpb@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add HAFT support for SVA
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 13:04:40 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709160440.GL118978@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f13b30cf-e885-44c6-8e61-7924937eb8ac@arm.com>

On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 03:13:01PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:

> Indeed if anyone does want to use SVA on such mismatched hardware and are
> happy to use a custom kernel with CONFIG_ARM64_HAFT disabled then they can
> and will continue to be able to do so.

It seems like we have a chip that is impacted by this. I'm being told
that the necessary ARM IP is not available in time to properly match
SMMU and CPU for its particular application.d

The chip is embedded so those work arounds are possibly OK - but I
think this issue keeps coming up and ARM should have a better overall
solution for CPU/SMMU mismatch in the ecosystem since it seems like
this is going to keep happening..

Even if Linux could automatically limit the CPU features to the SMMU
it would be a big help.

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 17:45 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add HAFT support for SVA Robin Murphy
2026-07-03 16:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-03 18:57   ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-03 19:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 14:13       ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-09 16:04         ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-07-09 16:44           ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709160440.GL118978@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jpb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox