From: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+fd95a72470f5a44e464c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm: fix UAF caused by race between ptdump and vmap pgtable freeing
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:49:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710-series-vmap-race-fix-v1-0-5b3794c113fe@kernel.org> (raw)
Kernel page table walkers fall into two broad categories - those ranges
where no exclusion is required via walk_kernel_page_table_range_lockless()
and those where exclusion is required via walk_kernel_page_table_range()
or walk_page_range_debug().
The former category is used only by arm64 arch code operating on ranges it
both wholly owns and does not concurrently write.
The latter category consists of kernel page table walkers operating on
ranges that are wholly owned (but which need exclusion against concurrent
writers).
The lock used for exclusion is the mmap lock, and for kernel ranges this
the mmap lock on init_mm.
ptdump is a special case being both the only user of
walk_page_range_debug(), and the only case in which it walks ranges it does
not own.
This presents a problem, as page tables may be freed under ptdump. And
indeed there is a use-after-free bug in the kernel as a result, which this
series addresses.
vmap promotes page tables to huge leaf entries where possible, freeing the
lower leaf page table when it does. It does this with no meaningful locks
held against concurrent ptdump walks.
As a result, use-after-free can currently occur. This series addresses the
issue by having the vmap huge promotion logic acquire the mmap read lock
while both setting the huge page table entry and freeing the prior leaf
page table.
The ptdump code already acquires the mmap write lock, so by doing so we
ensure that the ptdump walker only ever observes either the huge page table
entry or the existing page table entry, and nothing is freed underneath it.
A mitigation for this issue was already applied for arm64 in commit
a93b45fd397 ("arm64: Enable vmalloc-huge with ptdump"), which this series
has to deal with carefully.
This mitigation resolves the issue by acquiring the mmap read lock on
init_mm on vmap page table free if a ptdump is in progress.
However the fix in this series would cause a deadlock if we were to simply
apply it for arm64 without also reverting the change.
This is because vmap may acquire the read lock before ptdump attempts to
acquire the write lock, which then gets queued, and rwsem starvation rules
mean that the (unacknowledged) nested mmap read lock in the arm64 code
would also block, meaning the original read lock is never released and thus
deadlock.
This series works around this by #ifndef CONFIG_ARM64'ing the mmap read
lock in vmap logic, then partially reverting commit
a93b45fd397 ("arm64: Enable vmalloc-huge with ptdump"), keeping the
enablement of huge vmap support, and removing the ifdeffery with the
partial revert patch.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
---
Lorenzo Stoakes (2):
mm/vmalloc: acquire init_mm read lock on huge vmap promotion
Revert "arm64: Enable vmalloc-huge with ptdump"
arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h | 2 --
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 43 ++++-------------------------------------
arch/arm64/mm/ptdump.c | 11 ++---------
include/linux/mmap_lock.h | 1 +
mm/pagewalk.c | 22 +++++++++++----------
mm/vmalloc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: a635d6748234582ea287c5ffeae28b9b23f91c7e
change-id: 20260710-series-vmap-race-fix-2a4cac988938
Cheers,
--
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 10:49 Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2026-07-10 10:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/vmalloc: acquire init_mm read lock on huge vmap promotion Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-07-10 12:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-07-10 13:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-07-11 10:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-10 10:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "arm64: Enable vmalloc-huge with ptdump" Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-07-11 10:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-10 11:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm: fix UAF caused by race between ptdump and vmap pgtable freeing David CARLIER
2026-07-10 11:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710-series-vmap-race-fix-v1-0-5b3794c113fe@kernel.org \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=syzbot+fd95a72470f5a44e464c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox