From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4D3C43458 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:55:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=rfdZi5IAsAh/nmQjoUYUGkCmzMNnX1yQRLMIvJ0sJmw=; b=kmMIAuHVwleMGFjOtXpZk8Drdh FOA6a+sy+SLJMPEHqQnIXEVd8Q3lmuRGBddR+J8yg7o9iy1JwirG3Fm+qz16ioUAUVMmVsfoj1glx Th1NiNegMvcLAj4JMBnpVXQp55g1py1FeVcq8Q91JVvMmEh8Ijv8sIpkLlmWNlrAjeWJ+7J6VyG6D YlLeyE9bKDltF0qbAG8L2ufcOxjF3ajU6pU/L4qUQZoleCqYyFlvS8MqJ1B5cCdt+uJgp6pX62FI/ 3aLtFBmlvNqwqwgxWDRIXfch2iU/sj7UTBMqAeXgIUzgEGJ6yDfui6wchz3o9PSYiQBvJob3Fb4BT NQ2AHYIw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wiDZj-00000005E5m-3bjs; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:55:39 +0000 Received: from smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.13] helo=relay.hostedemail.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wiDZc-00000005Dyt-0SKS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:55:38 +0000 Received: from omf16.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2BE1C3C34; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F41F62000E; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:55:31 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)" Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Puranjay Mohan , Clayton Craft , Xu Kuohai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Florent Revest , Xu Kuohai , Ben Cressey Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: ftrace: support DIRECT_CALLS without CALL_OPS Message-ID: <20260710115531.626f1e09@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20260609-arm64-ftrace-direct-calls-v1-0-4a46f266697f@linux.dev> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: 1b516kuk3c4c1rip1isp7pq1m9efroyd X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout08 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F41F62000E X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX18VXkSf3RGQ5/OWlm4BQJh8NrDk/AyK9ZA= X-HE-Tag: 1783698921-218184 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1/ARi1Y+mMDcyLyMrsGbKd8T7pdCf3U5E+/bEmvRcWpNpXMmXFAgmgQMwx0coL3oTGo4ESx3LzWsN1pJmM3FEVw1cXW/ZqiiFvJm6lNo4WwQBEjcMMBNGYhriRw/3qCHxJrXwO57UxmANF2ZDarJOslhYoxzt+nKE+Egpr8HTSxXDGHCy6fYPwOT6MLrGRO6VDzD9hgX0Exofx8itHAHSGHRhc9oL/9FOeNb4otrGD6dqzaYuIeMhNuoIMGctXbBVpWkX/CEtLSyx35MgrrZpd3sC/vh8JCgQ7Ar6kabtuYyRvO16SvoSWN X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260710_085532_208662_460D5938 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:07:01 +0000 "Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)" wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a gentle ping on this series. It has Reviewed-by from Puranjay > Mohan, Acked-by from Xu Kuohai on both patches, and Tested-by from > Clayton Craft and Nathan Chancellor, with no outstanding comments since > Jun 11. > > Could you please consider picking this up for the next cycle? > As this is arm64 specific, the decision lies with the arm64 maintainers. -- Steve