Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:59:19 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717195919.GB701389@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714104202.1664187-2-amhetre@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 10:42:00AM +0000, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> 
> arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_cmd_p() carries two distinct reasons for
> flushing the current batch with a CMD_SYNC before appending the
> new command:
> 
>   - The batch's pre-assigned cmdq does not support the new command.
>   - The Arm erratum 2812531 workaround (ARM_SMMU_OPT_CMDQ_FORCE_SYNC)
>     forces a SYNC at one entry before the batch is full.
> 
> Lift those checks into a new arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync() helper
> so that adding another force-sync condition becomes a one-line
> addition. No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 23 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14 10:41 [PATCH v7 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Tegra264 invalidation workaround Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-14 10:42 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-17 19:59   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-07-14 10:42 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-17 20:18   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 21:16     ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-14 10:42 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264 Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-17 20:19   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717195919.GB701389@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=amhetre@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox