From: Yadong Qi <yadong.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: james.morse@arm.com, ben.horgan@arm.com,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
guohanjun@huawei.com, sudeep.holla@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: ptg-linux-kernel@linux.alibaba.com, yadong.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm_mpam: remove sanity check of accessibility when error interrupt is SPI on SMT platforms
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:24:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720072409.2660-1-yadong.qi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
On SMT platforms, an L2 cache MSC is typically shared between sibling
threads. Per the MPAM ACPI spec (DEN0065B), the MSC's linked device
should be set to the processor container of those siblings, so the
kernel derives msc->accessibility as just the sibling CPUs.
Per the MPAM spec (IHI0099B), when an MSC is not integrated into a PE,
SPI/LPI is the recommended error interrupt. SPIs are not per-CPU, and a
sanity check in mpam_msc_setup_error_irq() requires accessibility ==
cpu_possible_mask — assuming a shared interrupt must be routable to all
CPUs. This creates a conflict on SMT platforms: the MSC has a restricted
accessibility but a shared error interrupt, causing probe to fail with:
msc:N is a private resource with a shared error interrupt
This RFC patch removes the check to allow MSC probe to succeed on SMT
platforms, but this is mainly intended to start a discussion. We would
appreciate advice on the right way to handle this conflict. Is this a
spec issue, or should the driver handle SPI error interrupts differently
when an MSC has a restricted accessibility mask?
Signed-off-by: Yadong Qi <yadong.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
index b69f99488111..e8b2b5e00d7c 100644
--- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
+++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
@@ -1964,13 +1964,6 @@ static int mpam_msc_setup_error_irq(struct mpam_msc *msc)
if (irq_is_percpu(irq))
return __setup_ppi(msc);
- /* sanity check: shared interrupts can be routed anywhere? */
- if (!cpumask_equal(&msc->accessibility, cpu_possible_mask)) {
- pr_err_once("msc:%u is a private resource with a shared error interrupt",
- msc->id);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720072409.2660-1-yadong.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yadong.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=ptg-linux-kernel@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox