From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
x86@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/23] dma-direct: return struct page from dma_direct_alloc_from_pool()
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:33:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721153321.GO110966@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq5ao6g0750v.fsf@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 08:40:08PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 07:50:10PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 11:34:19PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> ....
> >> >> static void *dma_direct_alloc_no_mapping(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> >> >> @@ -247,8 +246,11 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> >> >> * the atomic pools instead if we aren't allowed block.
> >> >> */
> >> >> if ((remap || force_dma_unencrypted(dev)) &&
> >> >> - dma_direct_use_pool(dev, gfp))
> >> >> - return dma_direct_alloc_from_pool(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp);
> >> >> + dma_direct_use_pool(dev, gfp)) {
> >> >> + page = dma_direct_alloc_from_pool(dev, size, dma_handle,
> >> >> + &ret, gfp);
> >> >> + return page ? ret : NULL;
> >> >
> >> > Sorry for joining the discussion late, but the line above caught my
> >> > attention.
> >> >
> >> > Why do we need both ret and page? We can derive cpu_addr from page and
> >> > vice versa. Do we really need the &ret parameter? Or, more generally, do
> >> > we really need "struct page *"?
> >> >
> >> > static struct page *__dma_alloc_from_pool(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> >> > struct gen_pool *pool, void **cpu_addr,
> >> > bool (*phys_addr_ok)(struct device *, phys_addr_t, size_t))
> >> > {
> >> > ...
> >> > *cpu_addr = (void *)addr;
> >> > memset(*cpu_addr, 0, size);
> >> > return pfn_to_page(__phys_to_pfn(phys));
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > Why
> >> >
> >>
> >> With CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP the cpu_addr can be different from
> >> page_address.
> >
> > Can you please point to the code there it can happen?
> > __dma_alloc_from_pool() has direct connection between physical address
> > and struct page.
> >
>
> dma_direct_alloc -> remap = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP);
> if ((remap && dma_direct_use_pool(dev, gfp)) {
> page = dma_direct_alloc_from_pool(dev, size,
>
> ..
> __dma_alloc_from_pool ->
> addr = gen_pool_alloc(pool, size);
> if (!addr)
>
>
> We expand the pool as below..
>
> atomic_pool_expand ->
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
> addr = dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, pool_size,
> pgprot_decrypted(pgprot_dmacoherent(PAGE_KERNEL)),
> __builtin_return_address(0));
> if (!addr)
> goto free_page;
> #else
> addr = page_to_virt(page);
> #endif
Right, and nothing prevents you from adding a small DMA helper
that translates mapped/direct addresses back to struct page.
Something like, but probably void* needs to be phys_addr_t:
static inline struct page *dma_phys_to_page(void *addr)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
return vmalloc_to_page(addr);
#else
return virt_to_page(addr);
#endif
}
Architecture code already does this throughout the tree.
Thanks
>
>
> -aneesh
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 18:04 [PATCH v8 00/23] dma-mapping: Track shared DMA state through direct, pool and swiotlb paths Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 01/23] dma-direct: return struct page from dma_direct_alloc_from_pool() Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-21 11:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-07-21 14:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-21 14:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-07-21 15:10 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-21 15:33 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 02/23] dma-pool: fix page leak in atomic_pool_expand() cleanup Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-21 12:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-07-21 14:41 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-21 15:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 03/23] iommu/dma: Check atomic pool allocation result directly Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 04/23] dma: free atomic pool pages by physical address Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 05/23] swiotlb: Preserve allocation virtual address for dynamic pools Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 06/23] s390: Expose protected virtualization through cc_platform_has() Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 07/23] dma-direct: swiotlb: handle swiotlb alloc/free outside __dma_direct_alloc_pages Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 08/23] coco: arm64: s390: powerpc: Mark secure guests with CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 09/23] dma-mapping: Add internal shared allocation attribute Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 10/23] dma-direct: use __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED in alloc/free paths Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 11/23] dma-pool: track decrypted atomic pools and select them via attrs Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 12/23] dma: swiotlb: pass mapping attributes by reference Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 13/23] dma: swiotlb: track pool encryption state and honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 14/23] dma-mapping: make dma_pgprot() honor __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 15/23] dma-direct: pass attrs to dma_capable() for DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED checks Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 16/23] dma-direct: Move dma_direct_map_phys() to dma/direct.c Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 17/23] dma-direct: make dma_direct_map_phys() honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 18/23] dma-direct: set decrypted flag for remapped DMA allocations Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 19/23] dma-direct: select DMA address encoding from __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 20/23] dma-direct: rename ret to cpu_addr in alloc helpers Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 21/23] dma: swiotlb: free dynamic pools from process context Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 22/23] dma: swiotlb: handle set_memory_decrypted() failures Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v8 23/23] swiotlb: remove unused SWIOTLB_FORCE flag Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-21 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 00/23] dma-mapping: Track shared DMA state through direct, pool and swiotlb paths Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721153321.GO110966@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox