From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F603C531D4 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:24:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=fNXVYN3cdil7jpiILldIIfbm/p5uZSSuGNiGJ8Svcjw=; b=F8D6UZHu8nv/wGzEqfD8Jr7ipc FYf7IriBHvtX49W2zmMCCeTS/GqpiMHwOqG0sjWdRKtWadiXcY5IYoROlYhqMQGnrPcF8obrsJbEx 9p9mpkX9T6hYfs+ywaGMEvdWTnDaPz+cn2KJ3LertXST50yyWW2V+fgNPumeUIooumJyjHspRG+Mj 3FtQTiBBhXaKHuIsfoVvvmFMWdcJ3r6M15Ysf33YmILIrLTZj2i9T2pJPnG4GpbgClTylBnIYutyL /BLoBFyA9k2yBkE+VXMbRSkw3eqYTIMbRPY52/VykLYRinfd3QSD/k1G6CrzVYABOnN3Gs32+PTWX D2fEET7g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wmuL5-0000000EUfW-0Z2s; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:23:55 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wmuL4-0000000EUfI-08qi for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:23:54 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1B360A71; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB07D1F00A3A; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:23:52 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jakub Raczynski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 0/2] net/stmmac: Secure against failures of DMA memory allocation Message-ID: <20260723072352.6db4df7f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260715123602.51950-1-j.raczynski@samsung.com> References: <20260715123602.51950-1-j.raczynski@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:36:00 +0200 Jakub Raczynski wrote: > This series fixing two issues related to fails of > __alloc_dma_rx_desc_resources(). Original issue from 1st patch is related to > page_pool that has happened in testing env, while second was requested by > Sashiko to have similar change for DMA allocation. > To have complete fix for all failures of __alloc_dma_rx_desc_resources(), > merge two fixes into series. Clashiko is not impressed by the second patch. Is it possible to avoid calling the functions in semi-consistent state? -- pw-bot: cr