Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
To: will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, cychu@google.com,
	hhchung@google.com, amitamishra@google.com, marscheng@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw,
	eleanor15x@gmail.com, Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "lib/sort.c: add _nonatomic() variants with cond_resched()"
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:12:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730181216.2709088-3-visitorckw@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730181216.2709088-1-visitorckw@gmail.com>

This reverts commit e2a33a2a3258794891cdd6ca4b1318da6594d157.

After replacing the only in-tree user of sort_nonatomic() in the
arm-smmu-v3 driver with the standard sort(), the _nonatomic() variants
are no longer used anywhere in the kernel.

Remove sort_nonatomic() and sort_r_nonatomic() to clean up dead code.
This effectively drops the wrapper function __sort_r() and eliminates
the may_schedule branch and cond_resched() call from the inner loop of
the core sorting routine, slightly simplifying and optimizing the code.

Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/sort.h |  11 -----
 lib/sort.c           | 110 ++++++++++++-------------------------------
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sort.h b/include/linux/sort.h
index c01ef804a0eb..871775978af0 100644
--- a/include/linux/sort.h
+++ b/include/linux/sort.h
@@ -23,15 +23,4 @@ void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
 	  cmp_func_t cmp_func,
 	  swap_func_t swap_func);
 
-/* Versions that periodically call cond_resched(): */
-
-void sort_r_nonatomic(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
-		      cmp_r_func_t cmp_func,
-		      swap_r_func_t swap_func,
-		      const void *priv);
-
-void sort_nonatomic(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
-		    cmp_func_t cmp_func,
-		    swap_func_t swap_func);
-
 #endif
diff --git a/lib/sort.c b/lib/sort.c
index 52363995ccc5..8e73dc55476b 100644
--- a/lib/sort.c
+++ b/lib/sort.c
@@ -186,13 +186,36 @@ static size_t parent(size_t i, unsigned int lsbit, size_t size)
 	return i / 2;
 }
 
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-
-static void __sort_r(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
-		     cmp_r_func_t cmp_func,
-		     swap_r_func_t swap_func,
-		     const void *priv,
-		     bool may_schedule)
+/**
+ * sort_r - sort an array of elements
+ * @base: pointer to data to sort
+ * @num: number of elements
+ * @size: size of each element
+ * @cmp_func: pointer to comparison function
+ * @swap_func: pointer to swap function or NULL
+ * @priv: third argument passed to comparison function
+ *
+ * This function does a heapsort on the given array.  You may provide
+ * a swap_func function if you need to do something more than a memory
+ * copy (e.g. fix up pointers or auxiliary data), but the built-in swap
+ * avoids a slow retpoline and so is significantly faster.
+ *
+ * The comparison function must adhere to specific mathematical
+ * properties to ensure correct and stable sorting:
+ * - Antisymmetry: cmp_func(a, b) must return the opposite sign of
+ * cmp_func(b, a).
+ * - Transitivity: if cmp_func(a, b) <= 0 and cmp_func(b, c) <= 0, then
+ * cmp_func(a, c) <= 0.
+ *
+ * Sorting time is O(n log n) both on average and worst-case. While
+ * quicksort is slightly faster on average, it suffers from exploitable
+ * O(n*n) worst-case behavior and extra memory requirements that make
+ * it less suitable for kernel use.
+ */
+void sort_r(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
+	    cmp_r_func_t cmp_func,
+	    swap_r_func_t swap_func,
+	    const void *priv)
 {
 	/* pre-scale counters for performance */
 	size_t n = num * size, a = (num/2) * size;
@@ -263,9 +286,6 @@ static void __sort_r(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
 			b = parent(b, lsbit, size);
 			do_swap(base + b, base + c, size, swap_func, priv);
 		}
-
-		if (may_schedule)
-			cond_resched();
 	}
 
 	n -= size;
@@ -273,63 +293,8 @@ static void __sort_r(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
 	if (n == size * 2 && do_cmp(base, base + size, cmp_func, priv) > 0)
 		do_swap(base, base + size, size, swap_func, priv);
 }
-
-/**
- * sort_r - sort an array of elements
- * @base: pointer to data to sort
- * @num: number of elements
- * @size: size of each element
- * @cmp_func: pointer to comparison function
- * @swap_func: pointer to swap function or NULL
- * @priv: third argument passed to comparison function
- *
- * This function does a heapsort on the given array.  You may provide
- * a swap_func function if you need to do something more than a memory
- * copy (e.g. fix up pointers or auxiliary data), but the built-in swap
- * avoids a slow retpoline and so is significantly faster.
- *
- * The comparison function must adhere to specific mathematical
- * properties to ensure correct and stable sorting:
- * - Antisymmetry: cmp_func(a, b) must return the opposite sign of
- * cmp_func(b, a).
- * - Transitivity: if cmp_func(a, b) <= 0 and cmp_func(b, c) <= 0, then
- * cmp_func(a, c) <= 0.
- *
- * Sorting time is O(n log n) both on average and worst-case. While
- * quicksort is slightly faster on average, it suffers from exploitable
- * O(n*n) worst-case behavior and extra memory requirements that make
- * it less suitable for kernel use.
- */
-void sort_r(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
-	    cmp_r_func_t cmp_func,
-	    swap_r_func_t swap_func,
-	    const void *priv)
-{
-	__sort_r(base, num, size, cmp_func, swap_func, priv, false);
-}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sort_r);
 
-/**
- * sort_r_nonatomic - sort an array of elements, with cond_resched
- * @base: pointer to data to sort
- * @num: number of elements
- * @size: size of each element
- * @cmp_func: pointer to comparison function
- * @swap_func: pointer to swap function or NULL
- * @priv: third argument passed to comparison function
- *
- * Same as sort_r, but preferred for larger arrays as it does a periodic
- * cond_resched().
- */
-void sort_r_nonatomic(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
-		      cmp_r_func_t cmp_func,
-		      swap_r_func_t swap_func,
-		      const void *priv)
-{
-	__sort_r(base, num, size, cmp_func, swap_func, priv, true);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(sort_r_nonatomic);
-
 void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
 	  cmp_func_t cmp_func,
 	  swap_func_t swap_func)
@@ -339,19 +304,6 @@ void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
 		.swap = swap_func,
 	};
 
-	return __sort_r(base, num, size, _CMP_WRAPPER, SWAP_WRAPPER, &w, false);
+	return sort_r(base, num, size, _CMP_WRAPPER, SWAP_WRAPPER, &w);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sort);
-
-void sort_nonatomic(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
-		    cmp_func_t cmp_func,
-		    swap_func_t swap_func)
-{
-	struct wrapper w = {
-		.cmp  = cmp_func,
-		.swap = swap_func,
-	};
-
-	return __sort_r(base, num, size, _CMP_WRAPPER, SWAP_WRAPPER, &w, true);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(sort_nonatomic);
-- 
2.55.0.508.g3f0d502094-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30 18:12 [PATCH 0/2] lib/sort: Clean up sort_nonatomic() and sort_r_nonatomic() Kuan-Wei Chiu
2026-07-30 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Replace sort_nonatomic() with sort() Kuan-Wei Chiu
2026-07-30 18:12 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu [this message]
2026-07-30 19:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] lib/sort: Clean up sort_nonatomic() and sort_r_nonatomic() Kuan-Wei Chiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260730181216.2709088-3-visitorckw@gmail.com \
    --to=visitorckw@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amitamishra@google.com \
    --cc=cychu@google.com \
    --cc=eleanor15x@gmail.com \
    --cc=hhchung@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marscheng@google.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox