From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: fix ARRAY_SIZE() division by zero on UP builds
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:47:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-airoha-spinlock-array-fix-v1-1-863a7e239a5f@kernel.org> (raw)
airoha_alloc_gdm_device() initializes the txq_lock[] array iterating
over ARRAY_SIZE(dev->txq_lock). ARRAY_SIZE() expands to
sizeof(dev->txq_lock) / sizeof((dev->txq_lock)[0]), but on UP builds
(CONFIG_SMP unset, CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK unset) arch_spinlock_t is an
empty struct, so sizeof(spinlock_t) is zero and the expression is a
compile-time division by zero (undefined behavior), reported by clang
as "division by zero is undefined [-Wdivision-by-zero]".
Since the array is statically sized with AIROHA_NUM_NETDEV_TX_RINGS,
use the named constant as loop bound instead of ARRAY_SIZE().
Fixes: 78a35725e533 ("net: airoha: defer GDM3/GDM4 WAN mode and GDM2 loopback to QoS offload")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607311850.6p0ZUVq4-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
index dba7c52c0896..64619e9a704d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
@@ -3467,7 +3467,7 @@ static int airoha_alloc_gdm_device(struct airoha_eth *eth,
netdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(np);
dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
u64_stats_init(&dev->stats.syncp);
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->txq_lock); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < AIROHA_NUM_NETDEV_TX_RINGS; i++)
spin_lock_init(&dev->txq_lock[i]);
dev->port = port;
dev->eth = eth;
---
base-commit: 2fbade66245059c78daeaccfce13ecf499fffb51
change-id: 20260731-airoha-spinlock-array-fix-d239f7841cb8
Best regards,
--
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 15:47 Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2026-07-31 21:42 ` [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: fix ARRAY_SIZE() division by zero on UP builds Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731-airoha-spinlock-array-fix-v1-1-863a7e239a5f@kernel.org \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox