From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, fuad.tabba@linux.dev,
qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/20] KVM: arm64: Prefault host stage-2 entries on block split
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 11:08:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803100904.3563942-2-vdonnefort@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803100904.3563942-1-vdonnefort@google.com>
From: Keir Fraser <keirf@google.com>
For the host stage-2 that is idmap, we can avoid lazy-mapping on block
splitting by propagate existing valid mappings to neighbouring entries
of the new table.
Co-developed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keirf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index b74dd5ce1efd..34f78a58cded 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -1030,10 +1030,39 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_table_pre(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
return 0;
}
+static void stage2_map_prefault_idmap(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx, kvm_pte_t *ptep)
+{
+ kvm_pte_t block_pte = ctx->old;
+ u64 pa;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!kvm_pte_valid(block_pte))
+ return;
+
+ pa = ALIGN_DOWN(ctx->addr, kvm_granule_size(ctx->level));
+ for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; ++i, ++ptep, pa += kvm_granule_size(ctx->level + 1)) {
+ kvm_pte_t pte = kvm_init_valid_leaf_pte(pa, block_pte, ctx->level + 1);
+
+ /*
+ * Skip ptes in the range being modified by the caller if we're
+ * installing last level entries. Otherwise, we need to
+ * temporarily put in a valid mapping to make sure the
+ * prefaulting logic is triggered on the next
+ * stage2_map_walk_leaf(). This adds an unnecessary TLBI as
+ * we'll presumably re-break the freshly installed block, but
+ * that should happen very infrequently.
+ */
+ if ((ctx->level < (KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL - 1)) ||
+ (pa < ctx->addr) || (pa >= ctx->end))
+ *ptep = pte;
+ }
+}
+
static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
struct stage2_map_data *data)
{
struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops = ctx->mm_ops;
+ struct kvm_pgtable *pgt = data->mmu->pgt;
kvm_pte_t *childp, new;
int ret;
@@ -1051,6 +1080,9 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
if (!childp)
return -ENOMEM;
+ if (pgt->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_S2_IDMAP)
+ stage2_map_prefault_idmap(ctx, childp);
+
if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, data->mmu)) {
mm_ops->put_page(childp);
return -EAGAIN;
--
2.55.0.508.g3f0d502094-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 10:08 [PATCH 00/20] Huge mapping support for protected VMs Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 02/20] KVM: arm64: Propagate host stage-2 annotated entries on block split Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 03/20] KVM: arm64: Allow block-level stage-2 annotation Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 04/20] KVM: arm64: Use block-level annotations when setting up the host stage-2 Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 05/20] KVM: arm64: Make pKVM ownership selftest an HVC Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 06/20] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_host_share/unshare_hyp() Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 07/20] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_host_donate_guest() Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 08/20] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_host_reclaim_page_guest() Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 09/20] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_guest_share_host() Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 10/20] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_guest_unshare_host() Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 11/20] KVM: arm64: Add a range to pKVM ownership selftest Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 12/20] KVM: arm64: Handle huge mappings in __pkvm_host_force_reclaim_page_guest() Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 13/20] KVM: arm64: Handle huge mappings in __pkvm_vcpu_in_poison_fault() Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 14/20] KVM: arm64: pkvm: Warn on guest stage-2 block collapse Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:08 ` [PATCH 15/20] KVM: arm64: Add pkvm_hyp_req infrastructure Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:09 ` [PATCH 16/20] KVM: arm64: Add __pkvm_host_split_guest HVC Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:09 ` [PATCH 17/20] KVM: arm64: Extend pKVM page ownership selftests to cover guest block split Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:09 ` [PATCH 18/20] KVM: arm64: Add PKVM_HYP_REQ_SPLIT Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:09 ` [PATCH 19/20] KVM: arm64: Raise PKVM_HYP_REQ_SPLIT on guest to host sharing Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-03 10:09 ` [PATCH 20/20] KVM: arm64: Stage-2 huge mappings for protected VMs Vincent Donnefort
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803100904.3563942-2-vdonnefort@google.com \
--to=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox